Talk:Marc Canter/Archives/2016

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Marc Canter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Marc Canter/Archives/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

This is Marc Canter - reacvhing out to the folks who edit this page.

I have to say that the writing on this page is biased against me. If there is a resistance to me writing about myself, then I think you should also look at the biased approach taken against me - by people who do not share my political beliefs.

I have contributed to the open social networking effort, open standards, OpenID, FOAF, ourmedia.org, structuredblogging and many other lesser known efforts. I helped organize the Data Sharing summits - yet NONE of these facts are even mentioned, while me being a "3rd generation red diaper baby" is in the first paragraph.

I am not a politician, I am a technologist. My beliefs on technology should be highlighted, not my politics.

My blog is about the two books I have written, not just for crtiticising tech CEOs. I shoudlbe spending more time criticising wikipedia authors!

There isn't even a mention of my book: "How to build the Open Mesh" or it's followup "How to build a Digital City". Or any of my beliefs on 'dashboards' being a key notion for a distributed architecture of our future.

eg. this wikipedia article has made no attempt to understand what I am about, who I am or what I stand for.

I have recently moved to Cleveland to teach at CWRU and start a new company to innovate workforce development. No mention of that.

I have launched several social networks and worked with over 20 corporate clients helping them navigate the social networking world. No mention of:

- ROTCLink.com - for the U.S. Army - leamiche.donnamoderna.com - itimes.com - AOL - Ruckus Networks - aSmallWorld - WeeWorld - Sac Kings - RadioOne - Bell Canada - Cyama - GTChannel - PaidContent - SocialChord (RocklandNY.tv)

Please get rid of teh anti-Marc Canter rhetoric and state the facts - please.

Last edited at 01:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 23:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)