The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
I changed the line "Matches also claim to foster" to "Try to work with". I agree that "Matches also remain committed to" was a bit subjective. Any thoughts? RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just passing by but my general thought is that there's a couple of phrases which just sound a bit too "corporate", the sort of things that would appear on a company's website but never on a third-party encyclopedia. Things like "bring them to their customer-base" or "try to present customers with a selection of" rather than "sell". RoyalBlueStuey, I note that you have started a couple of articles on fashion/marketing companies and appear to be privy to private details such as website hits, might I invite you to read WP:COI and declare any relationship you might have with Matches? Things like the web hits will have to go unless you can find a public source for them. Le Deluge (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the requested primary sources. Does this means the Primary sources notation can come off? 81.137.18.46 (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The passing mentions like the McQueen one in the Mail don't really count, what you want are articles about the company like the Telegraph one. That one's OK, but more like that would be good - presumably there must have been articles in fashion/women's mags? Le Deluge (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I made edits whilst not logged in and the xlinkbot reverted them. I added links to Matches twitter and facebook pages. These are official outlets for Matches and were not on the list of frequently reverted links. If I am wrong to do this then I will not make further edits to include them. I am just assuming that it was because I wasn't logged in when making the changes. RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 09:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, social media are WP:LINKSTOAVOID. In general though any links added by anonymous editors will be treated extra sceptically. Le Deluge (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
