Talk:Muhammad Saeed Noori

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muhammad Saeed Noori. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Expression of opinions[edit]

The following edit[1] was in accordance with policy. It removed a paragraph, whose only citation was to an opinion piece written by Muhammad Saeed Noori and published by Al-Jazeerah on 8 August 2010.[2] WP:ABOUTSELF applied here, and the paragraph breached the first three of five the restrictions on the use of such material:

  1. the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;
  2. it does not involve claims about third parties;
  3. it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
  4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and
  5. the article is not based primarily on such sources.

The source is usable as an expression of Noori's opinions, and nothing else. If they are about the actions of third parties, Wikipedia needs reliable sources that those actions really happened (or did not happen).-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]