Talk:Naruto: Rise of a Ninja

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lack of Title[edit]

How does the lack of an official title fuel rumors that it's going to be coming to the PS3 and Wii? Shouldn't the article just state The game so far lacks an official title. Thier are rumors that the game may come out for the PS3 and Wii? Deathawk 22:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)? When is the game cover gonna come out,but when the game comes out,i hope it will be part action fighting,and half adventure.[reply]

I added a title for this discussion for you. ;) Manga_King

Announcement in Shonen Jump[edit]

The May 2007 issue of Shonen Jump magazine recently confirmed the fact that this alleged game is definately coming out. No more wondering if its all a hoax or something, 'cause it isn't! YAY! Manga_King

Cover Art[edit]

This may be a joke or a hoax, but I managed to unearth what may be the cover art for Naruto 360. Click this to go to the webpage I found it on: http://www.vgboxart.com/boxes/360/4502.jpg I would post the picture on here directly, but can't because I'm not a registered user yet. Manga_King

dude the box art is fake just to tell u sorry man User:hellgaets 9:21 may 30 2007 (UTC)

Release Date[edit]

Considering there is no other information about it's release date besides "2008", I think it should be changed to TBA 2008 instead of "Fall 2008". If there is any information stating it will be released in Fall 2008 I'd like to see it please. Also, add the game modes that I explained in the summary paragraph.70.83.177.152 21:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Your friendly neibourhood Naruto.[reply]

k u want proof that it's 2007 then go to this website http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/naruto/index.html GameSpot - Naruto (Xbox 360)] or * Ubisoft signs licensing deal for Naruto (April 6, 2006)or Naruto 360 concept art at NF they all say 2007 even ign or they say next year but if u look closey it shows that the artical was written last year ago

i have more proof but that all u need i when to 6 different websites and all of them said 2007 wheres ur proof .and one more thing it says According to the June 2007 edition of Shonen Jump hello we are not in june 2007

Ok, then just change it to 2007. And I know we are not in June but it is still known as the June 2007 edition. Yes, I know it's messed up, but if you want to complain, then complain to Shonen Jump. 70.83.177.152 21:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Your Friendly Neighbourhood Naruto[reply]

Wrong title?[edit]

I believe that this page features the wrong title for this game. Official trailers state is as Naruto: Rise of a Ninja, not the rise of a hero. So I think that this is a mistake -Jort227 10:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong title or no, the move wasn't backed up by any kind of proof that the title is really Rise of a Hero. I'm moving it back until SoundPound can back up his move. // DecaimientoPoético 11:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ive cheacked on every website like gamespy and ign and they all stay this games story will end at episode 80........that sucks were practically on episode 100 on the U.S,it should last a bit longer ileast

sequal[edit]

does ubisoft plan to make a sequel becouse of how early in the rearies it ends?


It's possible, but there has been nothing announced. User:Atomic Religione 22:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV in problems[edit]

The problems section seems very POV.

From character selection, to "spamming combos", to "skeptcism" on buying the DLC. That is all very POV, especially on buying the DLC.

The character seletion thing may be fine.

The spamming combos seems more like someone is mad and is making a review. Its the way the game was designed and stuff like that happens in games like these. I think it just needs rewording.

The not getting the achievements for the DLC. I will be fixing this one because it bothers me. Very POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skiracer712 (talkcontribs) 20:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing the part about character spamming and 'cheap' characters. It's just the opinion of a player who keeps losing and wishes to vent his anger somewhere. Whilst I agree I get frustrated by Rock Lee's dominating attributes, there's no section on the Halo 3 article stating that using vehicles or camping with the sword gives an unfair advantage, why should it be here? If anyone disagrees they may change it back or discuss it.

On the note of achievements, I've heard the collectibles achievement cannot be unlocked. I haven't the time or drive to try it myself, but several players on xboxachievements.com who've attempted to collect all gold and bronze coins have stated that the last two bronze coins are missing from the game. Worth mentioning alongside DLC achievements. Prodigis (talk) 09:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?[edit]

Uhhhh....who the hell is Stely? Iv'e never played this game, but I do watch naruto and theres nobody by that name. What was it supposed to say? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.69.48 (talk) 19:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I checked and there is not supposed to be anything in that space, somebody just added that ridiculous character name. I deleted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.69.48 (talk) 19:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genre?[edit]

The genre says it's an RPG, but it really seems like more of action-adventure than role-playing. Should this be changed? 76.209.228.157 (talk) 01:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

I do not believe the "Reception" section accurately reflects current criticism, as 1UP.com and GameSpot both boring Coin fetch Quest aspect of the game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.240.83.3 (talk) 20:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Naruto: Rise of a Ninja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Naruto: Rise of a Ninja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]