Talk:Newmarket, New Zealand

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Auckland High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge from Two-Double-Seven[edit]

The Two-Double-Seven article was marked for speedy deletion earlier today, but another editor changed the speedy delete to a prod. It appears that individual shopping malls are marginal in terms of having their own articles in Wikipedia. I suggest merging the article into this one as a compromise.-gadfium 23:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd disagree "with a marginal in general" statement. Generally, I vote for these articles (individual shopping centres) to stay as they are. They may be prosaic in many ways, but they are certainly a major feature in the lives of many people working and shopping there. However, until more data is added, I'd not oppose a merge, and to turn this into a redirect. MadMaxDog 01:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support a merge, as the mall article in its current state does not have sufficient information to warrant an independent article. According to WP:CORP, a business is notable enough for its own article, "If the organization has been the subject of multiple non-trivial, reliable published works whose source is independent of the organization itself." The Two-Double-Seven article doesn't have anything even close to that, so until/unless such sources can be provided, the information should be merged. If sources become available later, a separate article can be easily re-established. --El on ka 22:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From what I've seen I suspect every single westfield shopping centre was tagged for speedy deletion, with a lot of them being deleted. Currently a bunch of them are listed on Deletion Review. I'm certain sources out there exist for them. Mathmo ^Talk 16:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the link to Deletion Review above.-gadfium 19:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]