Talk:Nikki Grahame

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateNikki Grahame is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 31, 2006Articles for deletionDeleted
November 5, 2006Articles for deletionKept
March 9, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 18, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on April 11, 2021.
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 9, 2022.
Current status: Former featured article candidate


Revert[edit]

Why the revert? To my recollection, all I did was fix the grammatical errors. Treybien 1:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Documentary[edit]

Has anyone more information on the new Channel 4 documentary?2.70.228.77 (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove text[edit]

CC-BY-SA declaration: I've removed the following paragraph from the article because it is off-topic for the subject. I'm leaving it here in case its removal breaks any citations.

An ICSTIS regulator commented most of complaining viewers believed the makers of Big Brother misled them; they were under the impression they had voted to permanently evict the ex-housemate permanently.[1] In the wake of this, ICSTIS launched an inquiry which could have resulted in Channel 4 refunding an estimated £3 million to people who took part with phone or text votes.[1] Despite ICSTIS ruling that Big Brother breached its guidelines and misled phone voters, Channel 4 was not made to refund viewers and was instead fined and forced to pay almost £50,000 in administrative costs.[2]

References

  1. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference Watchdog was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ "Big Brother 'misled' phone voters". BBC News. 5 October 2006. Archived from the original on 20 February 2007. Retrieved 24 February 2007.

Baffle☿gab 03:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]