Talk:North Carolina Tar Heels football

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Typo/Diction issue?[edit]

"On March 12, 2012 The NCAA Committee on Infractions stiffened the previously self-imposed sanctions including, inter alia, vacating participation in the '08 and '09 Bowl Games." I think "including" and "inter alia" mean the same thing, so that's redundant. Or am I missing something?

Jimindc (talk) 17:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


History[edit]

So I've been adding a history section to the page over the past few days. I was wondering if someone at any point in time of reading this could upload some photos of old north carolina teams so they can be put in this page. I added two, one of lt and one of elizabeth II at a unc game. I'm not sure if they'll stay up, but we need more anyways. ThurstAsh13 (talk) 02:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elizabeth II.GIF Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Elizabeth II.GIF, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:UNC Lawrence Taylor sacks opponent Quaterback 1980 Medium Web view.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:UNC Lawrence Taylor sacks opponent Quaterback 1980 Medium Web view.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://catalog.e-digitaleditions.com/issue/39383 http://www.tarheelblue.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/061499aaa.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Dpmuk (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion discussion[edit]

Relevant deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_28#File:North Carolina Tar Heels football logo.png.--GrapedApe (talk) 17:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

conference affiliation[edit]

There appears to be erroneous content re:

Per the 2016 Media Guide, pg 190 and throughout, the affiliations were:

These will be reflect in imminent edits, including to early season articles. UW Dawgs (talk) 00:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MisterCake: Your edit purports to support UNC football membership in SIAA from 1912–1921. The three included citations 1) do not mention year or football, 2) covers track, and 3) covers track, respectively.
This existing citation, pg 190 establishes no conference affiliation 1888-1921, and then SoCon begining in 1922. Your edits have therefore been reverted as they do not establish UNC football participation in the SIAA and contradict the existing citation. Per WP:BURDEN, please do no re-add disputed content without providing a valid citation. UW Dawgs (talk) 20:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It was for the SAIAA mate, and seemed a fine citation. Cake (talk) 20:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to produce a citation pairing UNC football (not track) with the conference(s). Those three citations did not. If you feel otherwise, suggest you quote the material here when providing the citation. UW Dawgs (talk) 21:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, it seems UNC applied for SIAA membership in 1900. See here. Cake (talk) 01:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MisterCake: The citation provided atop this section and in Sports-Reference support Ind and two conference affiliations as shown above, though SR differs on 1921 in particular. Your citations, including using Track membership to justify football membership changes, have therefore been reverted. We may continue to discover conflicting sourced and perhaps tag accordingly such as via Template:Contradict-inline. You're encouraged to link and quote the material which supports football membership, as your citations remain unclear. UW Dawgs (talk) 01:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sports-reference is clueless on the SIAA though. They have nobody in it, and track meetings are the easiest way to find members, aside from lists in yearbooks right next to the football section. Cake (talk) 02:27, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Great. Look forward to discussing your citations when offered vs those that already have been clearly offered. UW Dawgs (talk) 03:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MisterCake: This edit asserts 1901 UNC football membership in the SIAA. That may or may not be the case, but is contradicted by the existing citations which you left intact. Specifically, the new citation makes no mention of football and the edit has been reverted as unsourced. Per WP:BURDEN and WP:V, please do not re-add contested material without providing a citation from a WP:RS. UW Dawgs (talk) 06:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pre-1902 SIAA will be difficult. A 1901 UNC yearbook might be nice. The newspaper sources at least show UNC withdrawing from the SIAA before and after 1901, and now a source lists them among 1901 members. Cake (talk) 07:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

disruptive editing[edit]

@Nomad3919: Editors have reverted your WP:BOLD changes and per WP:BRD requested that you discuss. Please do so. Template:Expand section may address your concerns, when you state them. UW Dawgs (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SnappyTomato: If you are not in violation of WP:SOCK with this brand new account with one edit, please comment here. If you are a second account of Nomad3919, you should review SOCK to ensure your account(s) are not blocked for policy violations. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:North_Carolina_Tar_Heels_football&oldid=1209297064"