Talk:Nunhead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copy and paste[edit]

A large amount of data was directly copy and pasted from the London Borough of Southwark website. [1] This was possibly a copyright violation and was not edited. Could be of use if edited properly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MRSC (talkcontribs) 14:30, 9 August 2005

Southwark/Lewisham[edit]

Doesn't the Southwark/Lewisham boundary more or less follow the old Kent/Surrey one? This would make Nunhead Surrey rather than Kent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.217.52.130 (talkcontribs) 15:19, 17 March 2006

Nunhead Cemetery[edit]

Is it really a noted fish shop! Markb 18:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Down on Nunhead?[edit]

Whoever last edited this article really hasn't entered into the spirit of things. I've simply had to cut out large chunks of it. Will try and work on the whole article a bit more. I live in Nunhead and it is a lovely area, much nicer than Peckham! Samwain 11:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nunhead Hill[edit]

I'm trying to find a good source for the height of this hill. The views from here are amazing. MRSCTalk 14:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV dispute - Regeneration section[edit]

This section has been marked as WP:NPOVD for over 2 years now with no discussion forthcoming on the talk page either for or against. As the disputed section seems to be political squabbling and not encyclopaedic information I propose to remove the relevant paragraph and NPOV tag at the end of February if there are no other suggestions/comments that bring us closer to a dispute resolution. Actel (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Clearly unsourced political POV.--Boson (talk) 09:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nunhead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]