This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject OWS, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OWSWikipedia:WikiProject OWSTemplate:WikiProject OWSOWS articles
Are the edits getting out of hand that add individual cities and movements to this page? After all, there is already a link to the List of "Occupy" protest locations. Pages related to the "Occupy" movement are getting flagged, and I don't know if it is a good idea to add fuel to that fire. Sngourd (talk) 23:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect discussion occurring for this article[edit]
There's a discussion occurring regarding a proposal to redirect this article to the Occupy Wall Street article, occurring here: at the administrator's noticeboard. Please feel free to comment regarding this matter there. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above was closed on 21 October 2011 (UTC). Northamerica1000(talk) 23:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted this redirect and restored the article, because an article this well-developed and backed by numerous reliable sources shouldn't be redirected without discussion. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:47, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the Russia Today news template from the page, as it had raised concern because it pointed to a single trending news page, rather than a selection of trend pages, and after discussion in the appropriate places, it's easier to remove it than it is to add lots of other trend pages, as I don't know of any (don't have time to look). If there are any comments, concerns, or suggestions please reply on my talkpage, as I don't watch this page. Penyulap ☏ 03:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
