Talk:Pescafresh

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Chandersingh700 (talk) 07:22, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The draft:pescafresh page was created by me however, I could find the page when I wanted to submit it, hence this new page was created. Should I delete my draft (draft:pescafresh) so that this page remains live or please advise what is the next step, as both the content is written by me. Please suggest!

As a follow up to my decision to remove the CSD, I thought I would give more rationale. The Draft page was written in a one-off pasting, so despite the fact that the two articles are pretty much identical there isn't really a revision history to consider. I have given the article a full review (in my capacity as an AFC reviewer) and while there are some minor issues, they aren't enough to keep this page from being kicked back to draft (I intend to fix some of them myself). I am not prejudiced against this being taken to AfD, but at the moment I do not feel that is necessary. Primefac (talk) 08:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]