Talk:Polygon Man

Polygon Man has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 26, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

North America Low‑importance

	North America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Video games: Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (7 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Stick Soldiers (1 participant)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Source[edit]

https://web.archive.org/web/19970419213934/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/032196a.html

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Polygon Man/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 19:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article.Tintor2 (talk) 19:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written[edit]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct:

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

Verifiable with no original research[edit]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

(c) it contains no original research:

(d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism:

Broad in its coverage[edit]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

Neutral[edit]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

Stable[edit]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

Illustrated[edit]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Overall[edit]

@Kung Fu Man: Everything looking good but before passing it.

Is the infobox necessary? Polygon Man seems to be more of a mascot than a character. Kinda like Segata Sanshiro but even less appearances
I'd argue yes: he was designed as a fictional character first and meant to be used more, really he's just missing a voice actor. Given Segata has appeared in multiple games I'm surprised he *doesn't* have one.
I'd shorten the second paragraph from the lead in favor of generalizations and remove references
Fixed, I think?
In video games is kinda short in respect to game appearances and important information so I'd suggest moving to history at least as a subsection.
Made a subsection of History
I'd rearrange a bit the reception paragraphs at least in terms of his role in the crossover game considering it's one of the most notable appearances. That's all.Tintor2 (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That one I'll leave simply because it's meant to be negative about the campaign, then negative about PASBR (since it's such a big ref) and then positive about both for flow?

Hope I got everything there.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written
Verifiable with no original research
Broad in its coverage
Neutral
Stable
Illustrated

Good work. I'd trim video games more considering it doesn't really say anything about the thing.Tintor2 (talk) 23:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]