Talk:Riddick Parker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:28, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Not a review, just a suggestion. This would be a lot hookier IMO if it were made clear that Parker was already huge when he was considered "small". How about "alt1 ... that American football defensive end Riddick Parker increased his weight by 26 pounds (12 kg) because he was regarded as "small" at 274 pounds (124 kg)? Cbl62 (talk) 22:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1a ... that Riddick Parker increased his weight by 26 pounds (12 kg) because he was regarded as "small" for a defensive end at 274 pounds (124 kg)? Source: The News Tribune (weight increase); The Press Democrat, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (small DT)
Hope that works. —Bloom6132 (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Created a day before nom, agree ITN appearance is fine; long enough; each paragraph/direct quote is cited appropriately. Article is well-written and no copyvio concerns picked up by Earwig. Sources good (lol at a 274-pound man being "undersized"). Hook also good and interesting. ALT1a is good to go. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 23:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]