Talk:Santiago de Surco

Peru Low‑importance

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Changes to Map and Information[edit]

I reverted the IP's map and information because I can't find any sources for their claims.Katieh5584 (talk) 16:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of reference[edit]

I also removed the added reference as it goes to a dead link. Katieh5584 (talk) 16:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I change the map[edit]

because exists a problem with Chorrillos but Surco have the reason, because this territory was the Hacienda Villa. Mapas Lima & Callao (talk) 12:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This reference cites the Ley de Creación de Santiago de Surco, where say Hacienda Villa. Mapas Lima & Callao (talk) 12:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where is your source for the map? Katieh5584 (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean by "exists a problem with Chorrillos but Surco have the reason".Katieh5584 (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at lots of different maps of the area and none of them look like the map you keep adding.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, I believe the original map was appropriate. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]