Talk:Sensory processing

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

2nd paragraph?[edit]

What on earth is this drivel in the 2nd paragraph? Why would anyone consider it a condition? It's clearly stated in the first paragraph that sensory integration is a routine (necessary) part of cognition and living. Additionally, it's a an area in which psychologists are highly active - this is my field. I'm going to remove that whole paragraph. Feel free to respond to my criticisms and reinstate it. Tdwright (talk) 12:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I won't reinstate it, but I'll point out that there is a bunch more nonsense in the article, and that paragraph at least had the value of raising suspicion among readers. "Sensory integration dysfunction"??? Gahh. Looie496 (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Sensory Processing[edit]

Sensory processing should be considered as main title, to create internal site coherence, since Sensory integration dysfunction was merged into Sensory processing disorder. The term is the accepted in diagnostic manuals and the one supported by more reliable papers and research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chibs007 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. That is, to Sensory processing, not to Sensory Processing... Lova Falk talk 07:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Sensory processing dolfrog (talk) 15:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Propioception, Vestibular, Tactile section[edit]

I think this page would benefit from added paragraphs explaining Propioception, Vestibular and Tactile systems in the relation to adequate sensory processing Chibs007 (talk) 17:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Target of "Sensory integration" redirect[edit]

Sensory integration currently redirects to this article. Could it be retargeted to Multisensory integration, or have I missed some technical distinction between the topics? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. And about dang time. Dranorter (talk) 18:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal[edit]

I think it might make a lot of sense to merge any useful content from this article into Sensory nervous system, and leave this page as a redirect.

The first few paragraphs of this article make very repetitive claims about it being old-fashioned to think of each sense as attached to a certain lobe. This is the aftermath of overcorrecting an initially quite ignorant article. Content on the history of knowledge about multisensory integration belongs there.
The remaining content of this article — actual discussion of sensory processing — seems to be already covered better over at Sensory nervous system.

Dranorter (talk) 19:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sensitivity (human)[edit]

Why does sensitivty (human) redirect here? Sensitivity (human) means the strength of human emotional reactions, and this seems to be about something other than that. Vorbee (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

I'm confused by the editorialising of the phrase "a very bizarre operation". Why is this in here? It doesn't actually strike me as that strange a thing to do, as strange science goes. You've got a person who can tell you what they feel when you poke bits of their brain. So... poke it and see what happens? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.147.221 (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Sensory processing[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Sensory processing's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "APA":

From Psychopathology: "DSM". American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
From Asperger syndrome: "Neurodevelopmental Disorders". Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5 ed.). American Psychiatric Association. 2013. pp. 50–59. ISBN 978-0-89042-554-1.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]