Talk:SimCity (2013 video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DRM Fiasco[edit]

Why does the article not mention the White House petition? https://www.change.org/petitions/electronic-arts-inc-remove-always-online-drm-from-simcity-and-future-games — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlitzGreg (talkcontribs) 11:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its not a White House petition. Its a change.org petition. The only articles that cover it say that it exists, and little else. - X201 (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am terribly sorry I see now I made a mistake, I did not check that citation, I did not realize it was a separate petition on Charge.org, I thought that was an article about the White House Petition. You are still incorrect as well though because there was the White House petition which gained much more notoriety which is the one I intended to cite, my apologies.
And it is worth mentioning and does have reliable sources, one very prominent being NBC News.
http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/simcity-launch-disaster-continues-gamers-petition-ea-white-house-1C8769125
http://www.gamefront.com/simcity-players-petition-ea-to-remove-always-online-drm/
I don't particularly understand why you mentioned the source was not reliable in your undo comments however, because Change.org is still a reliable source, you could have said an incorrect or misleading source, which is why I don't understand your particular use of such vocabulary.
To summarize, I was merely trying to give a better structure to the controversy, which is something that can be further discussed here. However, is it ok for me to go ahead and add the NBC citation with the White House petition information back? BlitzGreg (talk) 18:49, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When I said "is hardly covered by reliable sources apart from acknowledging its existence" I was referring to the fact that my quick search for reliable sources turned up nothing of note, apart from a couple of articles that basically said "there's a petition" and then didn't elaborate on it. I have no objections to the NBC source/petition info. - X201 (talk) 09:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then well I will simply readd that one piece to the existing section! BlitzGreg (talk) 11:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is it really DRM or customer surveillance? These companies have a solid database of where and when named users are on the computer ... that's got to be worth something to the right people. Who do they sell it to? Wnt (talk) 10:32, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on SimCity (2013 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. -- ferret (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on SimCity (2013 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]