Talk:Synapturanus danta

A fact from Synapturanus danta appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Synapturanus danta has been described as a "smooth lil fella"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Synapturanus danta.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 24 May 2022 by reviewer Cerebellum (talk · contribs).

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Synapturanus danta is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an audio file(s) be included in this article to improve its quality.
	It is requested that an a range map be included in this article to improve its quality.

Peru Low‑importance

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article needs a map to be included.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

I've ran out of energy for this one, I think, so I'm gonna write up a lead and then submit it. I really wanted to work harder on it and I know there's a much better article somewhere in here, but start class is a start, no? casualdejekyll 19:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Synapturanus danta

... that Synapturanus danta has been described as a "smooth lil fella"? Source: https://news.mongabay.com/2022/02/chocolate-frog-anyone-new-species-unearthed-in-amazon-peatlands/
- ALT1: ... that Synapturanus danta is a frog named after the Spanish word for tapir? Source: https://www.popsci.com/animals/tapir-frog-new-species/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Şevket Yorulmaz
- Comment: There is a minor WP:COPYWITHIN from text written by User:AryKun, which is attributed correctly AFAIK. First nom, let me know if anything here is wrong.

Moved to mainspace by Casualdejekyll (talk). Self-nominated at 00:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hook checks out and is interesting; article is new enough at 4 days and long enough at 2400 characters. Appears to be policy compliant and based on a couple source checks is not a copyvio. QPQ done. Looks GTG here. Either hook is good and referenced.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]