Talk:Tails Adventure

Tails Adventure has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 5, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Video games: Sega Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Sega task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (7 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Stick Soldiers (1 participant)
Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (15 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Translate from Español[edit]

I decided to be bold and translate the Spanish Wiki's intro to English. It's a little rough, but with a little help it can be fine. --SonicChao ^talk 16:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Does anybody know about this game's reception? I feel that the article is incomplete without it. - Up and over for a six! (talk) 23:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception about this game is absent from the internet. Formerly Codename Colorado | The Earwig ^{(User | Talk | Contributions)} 03:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tails Adventure/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shall review this article. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Development and release[edit]

The North American release date need to have its citation needed tag addressed in the prose and the infobox

Reception[edit]

" Mean Machines Sega agreed, calling it "decidedly unoriginal" and," - From my perspective, it appears that there is something missing from this section of text. If so, please rectify it
"1UP.com called Tails Adventures and Tails Skypatrol" - Adventure

References[edit]

Perhaps you could consider archiving References 3 and 13 like you have done with the other online sources

Overall, a beautifully written article. Only a few minor nit picks prevent an automatic promotion to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Thank you. I fixed all items. TarkusAB^talk 12:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TarkusAB: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]