Talk:Talos the Untamed

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2019. The result of the discussion was merge.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Talos (Earth-616) from Howard the Duck Vol 5 4 001.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements[edit]

Hi Jovanmilic97, you closed the AFD on this article, and I think you gave a correct reading of consensus on the discussion to close it as merge to list. There was a deletion review discussion not long after which concluded that "in theory, this subject could be spun back out into its own article (i.e. undo the merge) on the strength of a talk page discussion without need for DRV involvement, there's no evidence right now that such a spin-out would be warranted." So, let's have that discussion now. CarciaNullius has been working on a sandbox draft of the article (improvements thus far) so assuming that user is amenable to making use of their contributions, would it be unreasonable to restore the article - probably by merging edit histories with the sandbox? - and then if people want to do another AFD or whatever then we can do that, or we can let the article stand? Let me know your thoughts. BOZ (talk) 22:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so if there are no objections, then in a couple of days I will be merging the sandbox edits into this article history, and then restoring the article. BOZ (talk) 02:04, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the history merge of the sandbox into this article; if you have any questions or comments, please add them here. BOZ (talk) 16:28, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]