Talk:Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon (2001 video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PS2 versions[edit]

Perhaps it should be mention that although Desert Seige was never released on the PS2, it's campaign can be found on the PS2 version of Ghost Recon. The same goes for Island Thunder, which can be found in Jungle Storm as already mentioned by the article.--Lewk_of_Serthic 15:19, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

3rd person view[edit]

Is Ghost Recon 3 the only version where its in a 3rd person view? paat 01:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, GR2 was a 3rd Person Shooter. GRAW wasn't the first. (USMA2010 16:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]
GR1 had 3rd person. It was considered cheating by online players since it let u see over rocks. People would say STOP "F1-ing". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.37.59.82 (talk) 06:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GR Desert Siege.jpg[edit]

Image:GR Desert Siege.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GRGCBox.jpg[edit]

Image:GRGCBox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tomclancysghostrecon screenshot.jpg[edit]

Image:Tomclancysghostrecon screenshot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prescient storyline[edit]

Does anyone else find it fascinating that the storyline (released 2001) was about a Russian invasion of Georgia in August 2008...which has since come true?

71.116.33.13 (talk) 20:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent news reminded me of the game. Same year in the story line, 2008, Russia invades Georgia. --Josephdurnal (talk) 04:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)+[reply]

Same month, even.

This says otherwise. They say Red Storm Entertainment told them it was set in April and not August. So which is right? I didn't see a month when i turned on the game earlier. Venim (talk) 20:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As coincidental as it is that the storyline from years ago foreshadows current events, that doesn't mean the story can be changed to match what is happening in the world. The game references only "rebels" and not "South Ossetian rebels". Unless someone has a reference to a legitimate source for that claim, it needs to be removed. --199.120.124.214 (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But, ironically, the first three levels of the game are South Ossetia... Spartan198 (talk) 19:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC) Spartan198[reply]

In the very first level you are to attack a mountainous area in South Ossetia and the game even refers to the rebels as Ossetians. From the game, "The Ossetians have been skirmishing with the Georgian army for years, but lately the attacks have escalated to the verge of all-out war." Venim (talk) 05:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And what about the anti-ballistic shield that US wanna do? remainds me EndWar....... well at last it seems that US isnt going to battle russia, good. But that coincidence is freak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.140.43.196 (talk) 19:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • In a 2006 interview with the New York Times, Clancy suggested that the plot for the original Ghost Recon was inspired by a "letter" he had received from a CIA "official."

    REALLY CIA!--Aeec (talk) 20:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop putting in edits that GR1's story is related to the recent conflict. Trying to insist on it is OR. --Eaglestorm (talk) 19:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This should be added, as it's comparable to the many media that had events similar to 9/11 that were pulled due to that tragedy. How to include it is the question. Westrim (talk) 08:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't the plot of "EndWar" conceived after the US' announced the ballistic missile shield? Spartan198 (talk) 00:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • IMHO you could just mention that it is noteworthy that current events caught up with elements of the storyline with a link to the page for the Georgian-Russian conflict.
Done. I inserted two independent references that discuss the plot coincidence, it was noted by reliable commentators at the time(2008) and therefore meets wikipedia guidelines for inclusion. 86.41.157.14 (talk) 23:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry kid, but its out. Even if it has a reference, bring your theories elsewhere. --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry baby, but its back in. Seen as you have presented absolutely no legitimate reason to remove this material. So you can take your personal opinion elsewhere. It's merely a coincidence, like the Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan, deal with it, its notable, and if you actually thought about it rationally, if these kind of coincidences didn't occur, THAT would be really weird.
86.41.157.14 (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

In the Infobox, the "Platform(s)" field includes "PC". I think that the "Platform(s)" field should specify a value or values from the " Supported platforms" section of the Vgclegend template. For example, if Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon (video game) only runs on MS-DOS, then Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon (video game)'s Infobox should specify "DOS" in the "Platform(s)" field. ProResearcher (talk) 08:37, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I've changed "PC" to "Microsoft Windows". SCΛRECROW 08:44, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon (2001 video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]