Talk:Twickenham Stoop

Rugby league Low‑importance

	Twickenham Stoop is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby league, which aims to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league football related articles. Join us!Rugby leagueWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby leagueTemplate:WikiProject Rugby leaguerugby league articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rugby union Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Stub‑class Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Event Venues Stub‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Dimensions of the playing area[edit]

We don't say anything in the article about the dimensions of the playing area. The IRB laws used to state only a maximum length and width: 100m x 70m (excluding the in-goal area). But the more recent versions of the IRB laws now specify also a minimum length and width for pitches used in test matches. For a game between national representative teams the pitch must be 94-100m long and 68-70m wide. This is why Welford Road is not included in the 2015 World Cup venues. The playing area is too small.
What are the dimensions of the playing area at the Stoop? (I'm going to be there on Saturday, but I don't have a long enough tape measure!)
Mangodog (talk) 10:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valuation, sources.[edit]

The valuation is mentioned on page 6 of the 2012 annual report of Blue Sky Leisure Ltd (formerly known as Harlequins Football Club Ltd.), which operates Harlequins and owns Harlequins Estates (Twickenham) Ltd.

Companies House makes this information public in pursuit of its obligations under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Mangodog (talk) 18:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Twickenham Stoop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]