Talk:Valley Girls

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Valley Girls article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Valley Girls has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 20, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
January 17, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Archives

/GA1
/GA2

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Gossip Girl characters#Lily Humphrey|Lillian "Lily" Rhodes]] The anchor (#Lily Humphrey) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 05:49, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Girls (Gossip Girl) → Valley Girls – Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 11:54, 3 July 2012 (UTC) Unreal7 (talk) 09:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary disambiguation. Title already redirects here. Unreal7 (talk) 09:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Almost all the references added here mention "Gossip girl" in title! --Tito Dutta ✉ 12:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's your point? Unreal7 (talk) 14:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Actually, it looks like Valley Girls was merged into Valley Girls (Gossip Girl) in 2010.[1]. Both page histories need to be preserved somehow. IMO, the page merge should have been the other way. The reason why the content was originally split up into two articles was that the there were plans to create a new TV show called Valley Girls, with the Gossip Girl episode was being used as a backdoor pilot. When plans for the new TV show fell through, the pages were merged. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal Move "Valley Girls" to Valley Girls (TV series), to preserve edit history. 70.49.127.65 (talk) 20:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Update "Valley Girls" edit history is now at Valley Girls (TV series) -- 70.49.127.65 (talk) 06:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "Valley Girls" should redirect to Valley girl (disambiguation). 70.49.127.65 (talk) 20:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Valley Girls to Valley girl (disambiguation). Vegaswikian (talk) 02:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is NOTHING else called "Valley Girls". The fact that it's plural should make it impossible to mix it up with anything else. Unreal7 (talk) 01:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support A primary topic (such as Valley Girls) should not redirect to a disambiguated topic (such as Valley Girls (Gossip Girl)). And there are no other uses on the disambiguation page as likely to be referred to as "Valley Girls". Valley girls should probably redirect to Valley girl, though, but that's not part of this proposal. Theoldsparkle (talk) 14:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. And redirect Valley Girls to Valley girl. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:12, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support to fix the redirect from base name to qualified name; unneeded precision. (The disambiguation page Valley girl (disambiguation) should also be moved to Valley Girl or Valley Girl (disambiguation), since the ambiguous title is the capitalized one.) -- JHunterJ (talk) 02:13, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Valley Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090509214154/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/features/interviews_profiles/e3i605e3e8798d54f484577095da3714f0f? to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/features/interviews_profiles/e3i605e3e8798d54f484577095da3714f0f

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]