This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
@Lithopsian: Article clearly meets WP:CCOS which is the baseline requirement, and the sourcing and content is to a standard that I believe that were it to be taken to AFD that the result would be keep over merge (and I err mergist at AFD). ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 14:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In the second paragraph, it is asserted that "Vette's character has received a mixed response...abusing her via the shock collar has been met with criticism and controversy." without a citation. This assertion is supported later on with an anecdotal sampling of critics' reviews, which are properly cited, but appears to reflect the author's own synthesis and opinion based on their experience surveying this non-representative selection of critical reviews. This appears to be original research and should be properly cited and/or removed. 74.104.130.145 (talk) 00:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The lead in articles isn't cited usually as its intended as a summary of the body of the article.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
