Talk:Whitechapel station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Crossrail icon.png[edit]

Image:Crossrail icon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the Crossrail article the same image is listed as Public Domain (consists of only symbols and text. Is {{PD-Trademark-Text-Logo}} therefore more appropriate? johnmark†(talk to me) 20:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such template. Also, did you realise that this notification is from over eight years ago? --Redrose64 (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Station code[edit]

The code HAS bizarrely changed to ZLW. A quick check on the National Rail Enquiries site confirms this tractakid (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then how come the links with ZLW (Departures; Layout; Facilities; Buses) all fail, whereas three of those with ZWL (Departures; Layout; Facilities) still work? Curiously, the Buses link doesn't work for ZWL. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The site is contradicting itself! I'm sure you have seen that searching for ZLW brings up Whitechapel. I have taken to Twitter to get an answer! haha. tractakid (talk) 00:23, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/whitechapel-crossrail-station/
Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 13:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edit removing Hammersmith & City Line service terminating at Whitechapel[edit]

The Hammersmith & City Line article states that the services terminated at Whitechapel "terminating at Whitechapel while the longer 8-car Uxbridge (Metrolpolitan line) trains ran to Barking.

In my time (yes I know it's personal research but I'm sure it can be supported by old timetables etc) the majority of H&C Line trains terminated and reversed at Whitechapel and only a few extended further (mainly in the rush hour) to Barking. At that time there were four platforms which were reduced (and the service changed) in preparation for Cross Rail. johnmark†(talk to me) 20:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There have been lots of service changes on the Metropolitan, H&C, Circle and District lines over the last 150 years. Various stations have been used as termini at various times; for instance, the H&C services have terminated at Farringdon, Moorgate, Liverpool Street, Aldgate, and some others - we don't detail them all. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to train stock[edit]

"..that could accept either 6-car C or D stock trains" - would it be correct to assume that this refers to London Underground C69 and C77 Stock and London Underground D78 Stock? Harfarhs (talk) 22:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Harfarhs: Probably; the original C and D stocks hardly ever ran as complete trains of that type of stock, but almost always ran as part of trains composed of a mixture of other types, primarily B stock.

The A stock had been built as two 7-car trains, each with three motors and four trailers. The B stock had been built with sufficient cars (192 motors and 228 trailers) to form 60 more 7-car trains: 48 of these had the same 3:4 motor/trailer ratio as the A stock, but 12 trains had four motors and three trailers. The C (32 motors, 20 trailers), D (22 motors, 8 trailers) and E (26 motors, 4 trailers) stocks changed the proportions sufficiently to form 78 trains in total: only 34 now had the 3:4 ratio, whereas 44 trains could be formed with the 4:3 ratio. Trains formed only of C and/or D stock could have been run, but the high proportion of motor cars meant that some of these needed B stock trailers in order to form trains that were not overpowered. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]