Talk:YB SK Beveren

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality[edit]

I'm a bit concerned that there might be some COI going on here in the case of Robinbeck. See for instance "From the early beginnings, YB SK Beveren took AFC Wimbledon as an excellent example of a succesfull club based on fan participation." Sections of the article should maybe be rewritten for neutrality. JZ CL 16:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed a fact that I have a close connection to the club (I am a board member) but I'll use references for every addition to the text. AFC Wimbledon was indeed an example for our club as the early website reports and visits to the club confirm. However, feel free to add your concerns, since I'm not used to contributing to Wikipedia and do not have the intention of writing a false impression about the club. Many thanks for your aid and support! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinbeck (talk • contribs) 12:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most refs are dead[edit]

Most of the refs are news articles on Eskabee.be. This host is redirected to KSK Beveren, but the paths are no longer matching. I would suggest to remove all these refs and hope for a fan to get new citations. Rofraja (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of major contributor/editor.[edit]

According to Wikipedia, a major contributor/editor has/had a close connection to the person in question. Can we update the issue listed or revise the wording? Somebody294625 (talk) 02:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]