Template:Did you know nominations/Moving Pictures (webcomic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Intelligentsium 21:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Moving Pictures (webcomic)[edit]

Created by Maplestrip (talk). Self-nominated at 13:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC).

  • Large enough, new enough, well sourced. Hooks are all verified by inline citations. No particular preference from me. QPQ is done. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • The content of ALT1 is not backed by the source used as an inline citation in the article to verify this claim. The source does not even mention Paris. I have added a {{Failed verification}} template to the article where this is stated. North America1000 05:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • I changed the content. The source used states "As this book is set in 1940s France, Immonen uses a lot of photographic reference material, integrating it nicely into the book," so the prose of the image now states "Stuart Immonen frequently referred to photographs of 1940s France while illustrating Moving Pictures." (which is accurate). Another source does say "the look is influenced ... mostly from photographs of the place and time itself." but it's true no source specifies Paris. I removed the Alt from the options. ~Mable (chat) 09:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • I'll take a look at this; give me a brief while. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Article (still) new enough and long enough. QPQ is done. The article is well written, neutral, and contains now copyvios that I can find; Earwig's tool gives this 9.9%. Ideally, I would like to see a few more inline citations; currently, the article uses citations at the end of most paragraphs, and these citations do support the content within. I would strongly suggest duplicating some of those refs, though. ALT2 is cited inline, and the cited source checks out. This should be GTG. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
      • Cluttering the article with more citations than necessary to keep a strong text-source integrity? I don't like the sound of that :( ~Mable (chat) 09:02, 22 May 2016 (UTC)