User talk:173.196.216.2

October 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shidduch has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shidduch was changed by 173.196.216.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854352 on 2020-10-17T06:10:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:173.196.216.2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 02:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it’s my page. How my vandalizing my own page. 173.196.216.2 (talk) 02:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:2003 LN6, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Philistine99 can’t you pay attention to the fact that this was obviously just something in good humor? It was not a personal attack. It’s pretty obvious. 173.196.216.2 (talk) 02:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.196.216.2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A little bit of rickety should be okay. I’m an esteemed attorney at Richard, Dudley, & Stevens Esquire. Cut me a break.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.196.216.2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

answers to the required questions: 1. block is not necessary: I’ve been redeemed. I won’t do this again. 2. It won’t happen again thanks to Mark Patrick hypnosis last night 173.196.216.2 (talk) 13:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have extended your block to one week. --Yamla (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.