User talk:80.3.192.137

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome![edit]

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 80.3.192.137! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Do you know about the advantages of getting a free account?

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits. If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (80.3.192.137) is used to identify you instead.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:‎80.3.192.137 reported by User:Ymblanter (Result: ), at your service Ymblanter (talk) 11:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyobons mots 20:00, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.3.192.137 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am obviously not evading any block. I made an uncontroversial edit, only to encounter an administrator who, with conduct grossly unbecoming of any editor, aggressively edit-warred to restore unverifiable information to an article, in flagrant violation of core policies. You should block people who edit war in violation of core policies, especially if those people are administrators. 80.3.192.137 (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't need to look at a single edit or even the block log to know that you are definitively, 100% evading a block. 331dot (talk) 20:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.3.192.137 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That is funny. I think you are rather overestimating yourself. I am not evading any block. 80.3.192.137 (talk) 20:34, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Appropriate block. Yamla (talk) 21:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • We really don't need to go through this every time you're blocked. Talk page access revoked (which I should have done at the get go).-- Ponyobons mots 20:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]