User talk:Amkilpatrick/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Proposed deletion of 10x Genomics

The article 10x Genomics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, largely unreferenced. Sources that discuss the company are of dubious quality and largely by a single author. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Nothing better found via Google News.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 10x Genomics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 10x Genomics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10x Genomics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 21:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hidden Markov model

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hidden Markov model you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:20, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hidden Markov model

The article Hidden Markov model you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hidden Markov model for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

@Iazyges: fantastic, thanks! Amkilpatrick (talk) 09:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RECOMB 2015 Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RECOMB 2015 Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:03, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

ISCB Wikipedia competition 2018

Hi Alastair! How are you?

I am writing this message because we are going to remove our entry pt:Sequenciamento de DNA from the competition. Our decision takes into account the contribution of other users in the page, who are not part of our team. So, our planned contributions into this topic were covered by them. I hope it will not be a problem.

Another consideration is that one of our colleagues forgot to log in while editing Biostatistics. So the editions are attributed to some IPs (143.107.12.77, 189.41.1.246 and 179.220.96.45). We wrote this just to explain the situation.

Thanks for your attention! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorrFH (talk • contribs) 23:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

@CorrFH: thanks for letting me know, that's no problem! I'll pass the info about the IP edits on to our judging panel. Cheers, Amkilpatrick (talk) 07:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Amkilpatrick/Archive 2. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 23:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi Amkilpatrick! You created a thread called Creating taskforces of WikiProject, getting assessment stats etc at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Amkilpatrick. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Amkilpatrick. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to attend a mini Unconference in Mission Valley

Who: All members of the public

What: San Diego mini Unconference.

When: Sunday 3 February 2019, 6:00PM PST / 1800 until 7:30PM PST / 1930

Where: Starbucks at Fenton Marketplace

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host: RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.

(Delivered: 01:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)

@RightCowLeftCoast: thanks for the invitation, sadly I'm no longer in San Diego! I've just removed my username from the mailing list. All the best, Amkilpatrick (talk) 11:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: a reminder

Hi, following Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 16, please would you change your template for the above newsletter, and the relevant opt-out mechanism, to stop using Category:Opted-out of message delivery, and use Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery instead? – Fayenatic London 15:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

@Fayenatic london: thanks for the message, I'll change this for future newsletters! Amkilpatrick (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Integrated Genome Browser logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Integrated Genome Browser logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Why did you delete the vocals section in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Invisible_Way

Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.133.120.222 (talk) 18:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

In the Fishtank 7

WHY ARE YOU DELETING MY EDITS? WHYYYYYYYYY?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.133.120.222 (talk) 01:56, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Back off Amkil... You don't know anything about Wikipedia scumbag!

I didn't change anything! Seriously! I didn't add any fake information! WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS YOU SCUMBAG??? WHY SO HEARTLESS?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.67.186 (talk) 12:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Japanese Society for Bioinformatics Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Japanese Society for Bioinformatics Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Scotsman Steps has been accepted

The Scotsman Steps, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

A page you started (Thomas Lengauer) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Thomas Lengauer, Amkilpatrick!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added some categories.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Blythwood (talk • contribs) 21:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Wonderful work

Love love love your Martin Creed stuff. Writing about conceptual pieces on Wikipedia brings me so much joy. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@No Swan So Fine: Thanks! :) The other one I had in mind was 'Everything is going to be alright' - not sure if anything else will be sufficiently notable? Amkilpatrick (talk) 14:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

You might be right! I've done some googling, and there's some good sources on that one. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Work No. 227: The lights going on and off

On 7 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Work No. 227: The lights going on and off, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martin Creed's installation Work No. 227: The lights going on and off (pictured) has been described as "the first truly great artwork of the twenty-first century"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Work No. 227: The lights going on and off. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Work No. 227: The lights going on and off), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Backbone-dependent rotamer library

Hello,

Can you explain why you added these categories to the backbone-dependent rotamer library page?

" Assessment: Computational Biology (B/Low), Chemistry (B/Mid), Molecular Biology (B/Low), +banner shell, −Chemical and Bio Engineering, −Biophysics"

I'm not disagreeing with you but I don't know what these assessments mean, or on what basis or expertise they are made. --Math-ghamhainn (talk) 02:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Math-ghamhainn:, sure, articles tagged as belonging to WikiProjects are usually rated for quality (based on Wikipedia's content assessment grades) and importance (based on a separate importance scale). These help WikiProjects quantify the quality of articles relating to that WikiProject and should help identify areas where work is needed most within that WikiProject. With this edit, I just filled in the ratings for the blank WikiProject banners (and removed two inactive WikiProject banners).

As for expertise, that's dependent on the editor. I'm a computational biologist rather than a chemist, but I expect someone with that expertise we will rerate for importance in that WikiProject if they feel it's needed.

FWIW I think this has the potential to become a Good Article or Featured Article, but these ratings are attained through a different, peer review like, process (see eg WP:GAN for the Good Article nominations process). Hope this helps, let me know if you've any further questions! Thanks, Amkilpatrick (talk) 07:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Computational and Statistical Genetics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Computational and Statistical Genetics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computational and Statistical Genetics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Xarm Endris (talk) 15:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! Amkilpatrick (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DNA microarray glossary

Template:DNA microarray glossary has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 12:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, happy to delete. Amkilpatrick (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Apologies for the misclick

Didn't mean to rollback your edit, sorry for any inconvenience caused. —Kusma (talk) 09:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

No worries! Amkilpatrick (talk) 09:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPCOMPBIO Task force assessment

Template:WPCOMPBIO Task force assessment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Computational Biology Education articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Computational Biology Education articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Regulatory and Systems Genomics articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Regulatory and Systems Genomics articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)