User talk:Aub2010bcsnc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have removed the deletion tag for Trooper Taylor because I feel that his national recognition as one of the best recruiters in the country as well as the 2010 Auburn Tigers BCS National Championship give him additional notability and make him involved in a significant event.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wifione ....... Leave a message 00:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trooper Taylor[edit]

Trooper Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable assistant college football coach, fails WP:N and WP:GNG. College football project essay WP:CFBCOACH also concludes that assistant coaches are normally not notable. Paul McDonald (talk) 14:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. —Paul McDonald (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep forgive me if I am a little rough at this, this is my first time trying to involve myself in a Wikipedia issue. WP:CFBCOACH concludes that assistant coaches are not normally notable, but may be if "assistant coaches ... were significantly involved in a noteworthy event" Would you remove your call to delete the page if I were to include information on his significant involvment in a national championship team? Would you consider it a significant event if while coaching at Auburn, he filed suit against the Auburn Public Schools? If I edited the article with these, and supported it with sources, would that rise to the level of "significant involvment in a noteworthy event?" Additionally, I would like to argue that assistants should be considered notable because they meet the criterion listed as the reason why head coaches are notable. They have some of the highest salaries on campus, media coverage, the University markets them, they move to new schools, etc. However, the college football notability talk page only discusses the notability of players, games, and seasons. Not coaches. How do I add that discussion to the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aub2010bcsnc (talk • contribs) 16:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Welcome newbie! Adding a discussion is simple and you are very welcome to do so! Visit whatever page you want to discuss, and click on the "discussion" tab at the top. You can then add and crerate discussions as you would like, just as you did here! Be sure to "sign" your posts as well by adding "--~~~~" at the end.--Paul McDonald (talk) 23:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete - I dont think that Taylor has done enough in his career to be notable. Being a coach on a good team doesnt make you notable and the suit about his son is even less notable. He may be known very well around Auburn just like Scott Cochran at Alabama but he is not nationally known. Zwilson14 (talk) 20:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep For what it's worth, I'm a casual football fan and I've heard of him. He appears in enough third-party sources to be considered notable. This isn't just your run-of-the-mill assistant coach. HeartSWild (talk) 16:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I count them like associate professors--non-notable unless proved otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 17:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I agree they are not notable unless proven otherwise (which I believe I did), but that is not really a good comparison. Full professors are not considered automatically notable, whereas Division I head coaches are. Strikehold (talk) 23:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep enaugh third-party sources. Agathoclea (talk) 20:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Passes the general notability guidelines. Xajaso (talk) 22:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Amazing. Some Wikipedian's think that Wikipeida has become too good to waste its time and space on what reliable sources have clearly spend their time and used their space to cover. It is irrelevant if a Wikipedian thinks that Taylor has not done enough in his career to have been written about in the reliable sources. The reliable sources widely covered and cover this guy's every life move making the topic cearly meets WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Someone needs to close this one, it's an obviouis keep (and behind schedule) ... what gives?--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 13:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the helpful advice. I have restored the statement with proper sources included. "--Aub2010bcsnc (talk) 18:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)"[reply]

Reference test[edit]

This is the text which you are going to verify with a reference.[1]

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Maverick-Miles-secret-revealed-In-the-clutch-?urn=ncaaf-283084
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aub2010bcsnc&oldid=442717854"