User talk:Baxule

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


February 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm P,TO 19104. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sultanate of Dawaro without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Baxule (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sultanate of Bale, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Belwine (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Baxule, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Baxule! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Shit233333334 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shit233333334. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Amanda (aka DQ) 01:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baxule (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Hi recently I was blocked due to Sockpuppetry. However in my opinion I feel I should be unblocked according to the block details User:Baxule is a Sockpuppet of a user called Shit23333334 but I don’t have any knowledge of this user. According to Wikipedia’s guide to appealing blocks a Sockpuppet should appeal on the Sock’s main account according to the check user block Shit233333334 and I currently don’t know what to do because I have no knowledge of this user and I question how can I appeal on his/her talk page. Now that I have provided a small summary of my problems I will explain in more detail. According to the details I was provided with I was blocked for vandalism, and I am truely sorry and will try to contribute in a better way. Another reason I was blocked was because of Sockpuppetry. I was reported as a suspect because I focused on certain topics As user Jones6668 Jones6668 is actually a older sibling of mine which actually doesn’t pay attention to Wikipedia anymore. I also started sharing an interest to Wikipedia and contributed successfully and created a couple of pages. As you can see I was blocked Because of another users actions and I even noted On my user page that I share a IP. However I have realised my mistake and will keep more cautious on vandalising pages. I know this appeal isn’t perfect but this is all I could think of thanks (aka DQ Baxule (talk) 06:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. The evidence makes it unlikely there are two people involved here and more likely it's a single person, but it's impossible to be certain. The block would be inappropriate in either case, of course. Yamla (talk) 14:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello thanks for your response. In my eyes I am being blocked because of another users actions and even when I clearly noted on my talk page I share an IP it still wasn’t enough to convince the blocking Administrator. How can I prove my innocence. I swear that I have no relationship whatsoever with Shit23334. And I’m really stuck by block doesn’t even have a expire date so I’m technically banned. Please unblock me that’s all I ask for bro.Thanks > [[User: |Yamla]] Baxule (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Baxule (talk) 21:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I lack response but I will persist. All I ask for is to be unblocked I have provided by reasons, and that’s still not enough , so I promise I will not break any Wikipedia rules and I will no longer disrupt pages. I swear that Shit234334 has no relationship whatsoever with me I don’t know who this user is. I pledge that I haven’t created multiple accounts on the English Wikipedia. As you said it is impossible to actually know if I’m lying or telling the truth so I question why you think I’m Jones. This is all I have I hope my voice can be heard. (talk). Baxule (talk) 07:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baxule (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi I have came to request to be unblocked again. I am sorry for every rule I have broke and I promise to contribute in a better way. I joined this encyclopaedia to expand it and create pages and fix what needed to be fixed however after just a couple of days of joining i was blocked on the 8th of March And I was accused of Sockpuppetry. I tried to explain on my talk page that I share a IP Wikipedia:FAMILY However the blocking administrator might not have seen it. I am truely sorry for my actions (Vandalism) and I promise not to ever edit in such ways. I ask for your forgiveness and I plead to be unblocked. I will try my best to contribute in a good way. If I am unblocked I ask for the articles I have created to be undeleted thanks.

Decline reason:

The explanation in the prior unblock request regarding your relationship to Jones6668 doesn't add up, sorry. signed, Rosguill talk 20:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Baxule (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The articles I request to be undeleted are [1], [2],[3] Baxule (talk) 06:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baxule (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If I didn’t tell you that much about my relationship with jones I can tell you now. @Rosguill: Message text. Baxule (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC) Jones is my older brother and he introduced me to Wikipedia recently. He also helped me with my edits and explained to me which projects and articles I should contribute to. Nowadays My brother has moved on from Wikipedia. And now I am blocked for his actions. I hope this is enough thanks. Rosguill Baxule (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. SQLQuery me! 23:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

? Baxule (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baxule (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Hello I have once again came to appeal a block I feel like I haven’t explained enough. Firstly I would like to start of by saying I am sorry for every wrong I have done on the English Wikipedia and I really want to start again.

Vandalism

One of the reasons of my block was because of vandalism and I am sorry if I offended or got other users angry and I will try my best to help. However in some cases I was not vandalising but adding information. [4] [5] [6] as you can see I was adding sourced info and in no way was I trying to harm or offend other users. I was also accused for things I didn’t do. Even before I was blocked users would often revert my edits and claim it was vandalism and had no reason, [7] [8] I was basically being targeted and harassed yet nothing happened, and this is unacceptable.

Sock-puppetry

In early March I became a suspect of sock puppetry [9] I was accused because I contributed to similar articles and pages as User:Jones6668 However by the time I found the notifications I was blocked. Now I will explain I am not Jones and Jones is not the real name of the user “Jones6668” is my older brother and we share the same IP Address. My older brother introduced me to Wikipedia and told me to focus on certain articles and pages. However nowadays he has moved in from Wikipedia and as you can see he has said nothing on his talk page.


I’m sorry

I’m deeply sorry for my actions that have hurt fellow Wikipedian’s and I promise to be more helpful and contribute more. I promise to help build this encyclopaedia and I truely am sorry. I plead for your forgiveness and so I ask for my block to be lifted. ThanksBaxule (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We hear it was my brother often; it doesn't usually work, and doesn't in this case either. Even if it was your brother, it is still meatpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SQLQuery me! This is my main one please read here. Baxule (talk) 07:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]