User talk:Blasusususu

March 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm InvadingInvader. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mongol invasions of Durdzuketi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 18:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blasusususu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Bbb23 :Im requesting my block to be lifted due to the following reasons. :As Iask1 has already pointed out in his unblocking request, we are two seperate users that work together outside of Wikipedia in order to create articles, although I do understand why that may have caused some concerns. :I also want to point out that I take the rules of Wikipedia serious and would never engage in edit wars, etc. :Sockpuppe, I understand that editing an article with another user to make it seem more legitimate may be a reason for banning, however, as far as I can recall, me and Iask1 have never engaged in such behaviour and have always offered compromises in case of an editing dispute. :I believe that my block goes against Wikipedia's blocking Guidelines, as I have interacted respectfully with other editors. :I hope you'll take my unblocking request into account. Blasusususu (talk) 09:53, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"we are two seperate users that work together outside of Wikipedia in order to create articles" This is sockpuppetry. See WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 11:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Blasusususu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello User:Yamla, Im writing this second unban request for my Wikipedia account, which was blocked a time ago due to the accusation of Sock puppetry. I admit that I was not informed as well about the rules of Wikipedia and sincerely apologize for my actions and understand why working with Iask1 through other messaging platforms may have caused some concerns. However, I would like to emphasize that I would never abuse multiple accounts by vandalising articles etc. and that I take the rules of Wikipedia very seriously. Since the account I was accused of Sockpupping with, User Iask1, was unbanned a time ago by User:Rosguill, I'm writing this second unblocking request and promise in the future to contribute to Wikipedia in good faith. Blasusususu (talk) 12:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I concur with Rosquill's reckoning on the other account and that the block should be lifted here as well. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]