User talk:BosniakDefender001
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
BosniakDefender001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why is the block appropriate? I am willing to find a solution about Jazzar Pasha's ethnic origin on his article, but I have not received any reply to my Talk-section. I have added (IIRC) 11 different sources calling Jazzar a Bosniak. I am not talking nonsense. My request is clear: Unblock me from editing, change the page into something neutral (Like: A Muslim from the Ottoman Empire), and tell @Alltan to debate on the Talk-page.
Decline reason:
No, you badly damaged any chance of being unblocked with "It is clear that Albanians are unwilling to talk logically." We don't tolerate racism or bigotry on Wikipedia. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BosniakDefender001 (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
BosniakDefender001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am here to build an encyclopedia. However, I am here to build and encyclopedia based on facts, not fiction. I have stated my concerns regarding Jezzar Pasha's wikipedia page, which is being flooded by Albanian nationalists who use inferior sources to claim an important Bosniak figure as their own. I have cited both modern and historic sources that prove Jezzar's ethnicity. BosniakDefender001 (talk) 09:42, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Wikipedia is a collaborative project, where you must communicate with others to acheive a consensus as to what an article should say. In most editing disputes, everyone thinks that they are correct, but we all must work together to sort out disputes. There are proper channels for resolving disputes should discussion fail. To be unblocked you are going to need to indicate a willingness to discuss your concerns with other editors to arrive at a consensus, and failing that, using proper procedures to mediate the dispute. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BosniakDefender001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The page has been changed once again, without any reply to my Talk-section on Jazzar Pasha's article. Please, unblock me from editing, change the Wikipedia page of Jazzar Pasha, and lock it until we find a solution. It is clear that Albanians are unwilling to talk logically.
Decline reason:
Your request here makes it very, very clear that the block is appropriate. This is an easy decline. Yamla (talk) 14:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
April 2023[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Courcelles (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.