User talk:Bowielkk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paydollar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.paydollar.com/eng/aboutus.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in AsiaPay[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on AsiaPay, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because AsiaPay is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting AsiaPay, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paydollar[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paydollar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable product by redlinked company; cannot find multiple non-trivial mentions of PayDollar in independent, reliable sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Somno (talk) 03:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional edits[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. Somno (talk) 11:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Asiapay[edit]

A tag has been placed on Asiapay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mifter (talk) 02:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Asiapay[edit]

A tag has been placed on Asiapay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Asiapay, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Asiapay and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --If you have questions, please leave a comment on my talk page (Jakebathman) 08:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bowielkk, not sure if you saw my reply to the message you left on my talk page? Please have a read through the links I provided. You have made an effort to include references that refer to Asiapay, but these are trivial mentions (i.e. they just mention the company's name in passing) and they are not wholly independent of Asiapay. Have reliable sources discussed Asiapay in a non-trivial way? For example, have newspaper/magazine/journal articles been written about Asiapay's services, business model, etc? Not press releases from Asiapay, but articles written by companies and organisations independent of Asiapay. Then the article would have a chance of surviving deletion. Regards, Somno (talk) 08:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Articles on Wikipedia must be encyclopedic in nature. This means meeting notability standards as well as verifiable third party sources. Please also see What Wikipedia is not for more information about what types of articles are proper for Wikipedia. The article you have written is more like an advertisement for a company rather than an objective article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakebathman (talkcontribs) 08:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paydollar paygate, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hkcs.org.hk/ictawards/itawards/year2004/itawards/english/winners_smes_pro2.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]