User talk:Charles Matthews

• /About me
• /Plaudits

"D-bar operator" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect D-bar operator has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § D-bar operator until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Charles

Hello Charles, how are you? I hope you can take a look at this page and consider deleting it. I believe this person hasn’t done anything noteworthy to warrant a page; they just received an award on Wikipedia, and most of the sources are from local blogs Thank you Editorahmad (talk) 02:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

@Editorahmad: Take it to a deletion process. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

how i can do that ? and what is your idea? @Charles Matthews Editorahmad (talk) 09:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

G11 ? or what is the best reason for this page to deletion process ? Editorahmad (talk) 09:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Well, I think you are wasting my time here. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite Victoria County History

Template:Cite Victoria County History has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 18:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of mathematical theories for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of mathematical theories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mathematical theories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

D.Lazard (talk) 08:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

• Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
• Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
• Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
• Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
• Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
• Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
• Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
• Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)