User talk:Confused guy 152

May 2022[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Ganges has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mayapur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 07:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Hi Confused guy 152! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Habibganj railway station that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In Wikipedia, an article title is a natural-language word or expression that indicates the subject of the article; as such, the article title is usually the name of the person, or of the place, or of whatever else the topic of the article is. However, some topics have multiple names, and some names have multiple topics; this can lead to disagreement about which name should be used for a given article's title. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used, as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources. See WP:COMMONNAME.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that in this edit to Hindutva, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jp×g 18:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Delhi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Do not remove of sourced content and sources. And do not add Indic scripts since it contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT policy. If you have issues, discuss in the talk page and gain consensus. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Fun"[edit]

Moving your real userpage and talkpage to a non-existent username may be "fun", but it's also disruptive. I have moved them back. Any more fun stuff and you'll be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 09:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen non existent? It's my real name in Devnagari script. And you're a rude human Confused guy 152 (talk) 09:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen and you know you wanna block me? Go ahead. Let's see how many such accounts you can block Confused guy 152 (talk) 09:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your real name? So what? It's a non-existent username. A non-existent user obviously can't have a userpage and user talkpage. Just stop messing about. Bishonen | tålk 10:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: Please can you move this page back to its original name User talk:Confused guy 152 and then delete the redirect. It will not let me do the move.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What, again? I see this user tried a fun move again, and then tried incompetently to move back to "Confused guy 152", but spelled it wrong. "Confused guy152" is not the same (a space missing), so, again, there is no such user. Confused guy, you're being a lot of trouble. This is your positively last warning: one more move of your userpages (or any other pages) that makes work for others, and you will be blocked for good. I'll move the pages back yet again. Bishonen | tålk 08:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

PS, if what you want to do is change your username, please go to Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the instructions there. Don't move any pages; they will be moved automatically. Bishonen | tålk 08:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Edit on Fatehabad District Page[edit]

You seem to have removed Urdu, Punjabi and Hindi wordings of Fatehabad name on Fatehabad District Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatehabad_district but you did not provide any reason for doing that in edit summary. So, the edit is being reverted. Securearth (talk) 05:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the edit is not being reverted as the edit was correct as of wikipedia consensus of "no indic script", but next time making an edit, please include a summary for explaination of deletion of information. Securearth (talk) 05:09, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indic Script[edit]

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Nashik, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/India-related articles, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 11:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Delhi. Serols (talk) 11:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Removing a big chunk of text which actually itself explains that it is based on consensus in several RfC's is pure vandalism. It follows on several other disruptive removals of sourced content from Delhi, about which you have been warned above. You have been blocked for two weeks. Any further similar disruption is likely to be met with an indefinite block. You can request unblock by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 18:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 10:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]