User talk:Dreamerlight00

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Rdp060707. An edit that you recently made to Bashar Masri seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ---Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 08:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Bashar Masri. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Bashar Masri. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 11:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bashar Masri. Materialscientist (talk) 11:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:BasharMasri3064.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:BasharMasri3064.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Dreamerlight00. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Bashar Masri ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations, ANI[edit]

Copyright problem icon One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Idefinitely blocked for advertising, copyright violations[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dreamerlight00 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

im so new to this and did not know about the rules besides im not very well in english please ublock me i will be very carefull and read the rules well im still learning about this so its not fair to block me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dreamerlight00 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i do not think the block is no longer necessary i understand now why i got blocked, and i will not do it again, in additional to that i will make productive contributions instead. I will be very careful and follow the rules here next time promise

Decline reason:

Instead of repeating talking points back to us, please demonstrate your understanding by specifically describing what you did wrong, how you won't do it again, and exactly what contributions you wish to make, such as what articles or topics areas you want to edit. An explanation is especially important for copyright violations, as such violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy. As such, we must be certain that you understand what copyright is and when it is acceptable to use copyrighted content, and when it isn't. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dreamerlight00 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What i did wrong was advertising and promotion for Bashar Mari and i was repeatedly editing his Wikipedia only not a different kind of Wikipedia pages but for your information all the edits i added to his wikipiday page is true as he is from my family and he told me to edit some old information on his wikipiday page. Next time i edit something i will do it in a professional way and i will not type in an advertising way plus i will not only edit a specific page no i will edit other pages if i notice old details or typos. i might go to edit Arabic topics in general such as fishing and touring. i will not copy text from other sources, and whenever i want to add something that has a copyright material im gonna make sure i have permission from the copyright holder other than that i would not use a something consider as a copyright material

Decline reason:

This is difficult to understand. You might consider contributing to the version of Wikipedia in your native language if you're not a native speaker of English. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dreamerlight00 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here sir you are not being understandable i don't want my account to be blocked forever ok I'm not planning to use it in the meantime but in the future i would come back to edit, i already apologized about what i did and promised you to not do the same mistakes again as i understand the rules here

Decline reason:

You're making less and less sense. As this is your fifth request, and most people just get three, I am revoking access to your talk page since none of these further requests have been productive and that's likely to continue, so it's just a waste of your time and ours to keep entertaining them. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 07:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]