User talk:Gunmetal Angel/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Need some assistance at Until We Have Faces

Could you please look at the track listing at Until We Have Faces. It makes no sense to keep an iTunes exclusive track (likely to be included in some future deluxe edition) as a separate track when it's the only extra track. Someone merged it and a few editors have tried to separate it. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm not understanding what you want me to do. • GunMetal Angel 21:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Iwrestledabearonce genre feuding

Hello, Gunmetal Angel. Which one did you prefer: the infobox with or without the genre section? Ever since it was removed, there was less opportunity to change genres, but people have come and replaced it, even after reversion. I think I preferred it without a infobox area for the genre. Also, I'm thinking that I could submit the page for protection sometime. I'm not concerned about what the band's genre is; I probably couldn't give less of a crap at this point. Do you have thoughts about the genre field and protection? Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 05:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I guess just remove it, I mean that's what I did when a bunch of kids came around to Underoath's metal as fuck first two albums and couldn't decide wether these albums were deathcore, black metal, death metal, metalcore or hardcore-influenced Christian holy unblack metal. Just remove the infobox section, it's frankly for the best since – as you know – IWABO generally are just this mathy metalcore band with no real genre certification beyond that. • GunMetal Angel 05:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
All right, I think I will do that. Thanks for the input. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 22:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Semi-protection of Whitechapel (band)

I have semi-protected Whitechapel (band) for a month. Perhaps this will help a little in the endless battle against vandalism which you are continually fighting there. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, at least someone has now taken understanding to the vandalism that continously goes on at that band's article. • GunMetal Angel 00:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AA Reckless & Relentless.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AA Reckless & Relentless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

√ taken care of • GunMetal Angel 06:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Reply

I have replied to your post on my talk.--3family6 (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

RE: Nile… a death metal band that is influenced from Pokémon?

Ha, thanks for noticing those things. I hadn't looked at it in a joking light per se, although that is certainly a nice way to look at it; I certainly wasn't being dead serious about it. It is fun making such edit summaries as a response to vandalism like that; sometimes, do make jokes in edit summaries. But yeah, those edit summary sections can be pretty cool. Cheers and thanks for the note. :D Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 05:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Dr. Acula

My adding the genre Partycore to Dr. Acula was in no way vandalism. Vandalism would be erasing the article on Abraham Lincoln, and saying he invented pizza. Also I don't see why you would call me a genre warrior, I am trying to be civil and have a conversation or maybe debate with you. I would understand if you were saying this because I completely replaced the genre with another. Also it is to my understanding that users are expected to be polite to one another, due to civility being part of wikipedia's code of conduct and one of the five pillars, I wouldn't call swearing at me civil. If you are so willing to fight about what genre a band falls under, maybe you aren't cut out to be an editor of Wikipedia. This is not a personal attack, I'm not trying to start a flame war. I just want to have a discussion. And now it appears that my user page has been deleted. Bohanglez (talk) 22:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Considering what you consider "civil" doesn't concern me at all. Plus you have no room to speak within the instance of you being barely an editor on here yet unexperienced to actually think you can go on an article and write some bullshit like "partycore" on an article for a band. Oh and by the way saying "bullshit", is not against personal attacks in Wikipedia's valid point or anything else within the guidelines of being civil or faith. It's not like I'm calling you a "fag" or an "asshole", but putting enthesis on my point is all what it is, so your mentions of that was not only pointless, but goes off topic and you still have nothing to do debate about or make a conversation through a make-believe music genre created by a few middle school kids that most like called the band "screamo" before going on last.fm. So your comments really make no sense to me within terms of you trying to debate, but having a conversation is okay as long as you at least are coming to an understanding. • GunMetal Angel 22:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Dubstep

Hello, Gunmetal Angel. A discussion regarding your addition regarding dubstep's influence on bands has been initiated on the talk page of the article with regards to whether or not it's notable enough to warrant inclusion. Just giving you a heads-up in case you want to weigh in on it. Kaini (talk) 21:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, Gunmetal Angel. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Dreadstar 20:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The article No Time to Bleed (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable, non-charting song. Fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 21:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Dead Press

Hey Gunmetal. Dead Press stuff was removed from a bunch of pages because it wasn't seen as a reliable music review site (self-published, no indication of wide readership) and had some bad malware issues in its links. There was a discussion about it here:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 91#Reputable music review? The site is bad news, imo. Going to re-yank it. Cheers, The Interior (Talk) 06:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

FIY

As an FIY, a statement about deathcore also being a hardcore punk fusion has been posted on the deathcore talk page for a week or two now. I'm just posting this message on your talk just in case you want to discuss, and did not notice the talk page post. Thanks,--3family6 (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Geoffrey Higgins

According to Woe, Is Me's official Facebook, their members are "Tyler, Austin, Michael, Kevin, Ben, Cory". This same method is being used to decide that Dallon Weekes and Ian Crawford are not official members of Panic! at the Disco. As of now, their is no evidence stating that Higgins is a permanent member. Please find a source for him being permanent. Until then, he will remain being listed as a touring member. --KЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 02:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Dude, least I can do is ask of you to lighten up. Facebook listed members are usually never kept up to date & with that said, I had some words with this guy & he said he's playing on the new album so obviously he's in the band. Sorry for not responding earlier, I had to get a new temporary keyboard due to spilling water on my other one. =( - GunMetal Angel 03:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Not trying to be heavy, sorry if I came off like that. But hat wouldn't necessarily mean he's in the band, and there still isn't any published proof. As of now, all we know for sure is that he plays live shows with them which would make him a touring member. If you manage to find anything, give me a heads up. --KЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 21:31, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Just kidding, found something --KЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 21:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

In Fear And Faith

Regarding my change in the members, if you look on twitter Jarred DeArmas has been filling in for Tyler as bassist. Also on twitter, Tyler has taken the infaf off his name. So it's safe to say that Tyler, at least, is not a member of the band anymore. Whether Jarred has become a permanent replacement isn't clear. Maybe the member section should be changed to feature touring members, since nobody in the band has announced what is going on with the bassist and rhythm guitar positions. Thanks for assuming I'm crazy and I'm smoking something. haha But I was just trying to help out, sorry dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anhedonia23 (talkcontribs) 19:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

My edit summaries are usually just satire, so don't take it personally. I'm kind of a funny guy. But anyways, umm I spoke to Ramin and he said DeArmas is only filling in for bass, he isn't officially part of the band, and substitutes aren't official members. That's the reason why the change was reverted. -- GunMetal Angel 19:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

hi

sorry about that i wasnew today so can you help make me become famous ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightnurse denise (talkcontribs) 21:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

AIV

Question for you there when you have a minute. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

TBDM

Hey man does your browser display the infobox image of TBDM? It kinda does not work with any browser i viewed it..--Der Golem (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't know, but it sure was pissing me off. I'm trying to find out how to fix it, I mean it works when not placed in the infobox but yeah, it's kinda shit. -- GunMetal Angel 19:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Is it because of the dimensions of the image? Maybe an image with that kind of aspect ratio isn't rendered because of how it would change the rest of the info box. I would recommend moving that image into the article and finding a new image for the info box. --Triesault (talk) 18:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
I added a new image based off of GunMetal Angel's idea and added it to the info box. The Black Dahlia Murder collage --Triesault (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Sweet, thanks bro. - GunMetal Angel 21:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
I think I figured out what happened to your image. The thumbnail never generated. I realized this when I tried to use the thumbnail on another wiki page. I have no idea how this could have been corrected. I'm guessing an admin would have to be contacted and they might be able to force the thumbnail to be regenerated. --Triesault (talk) 19:38, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok

Ok bro, ok (Avenged Sevenfold). :) I am just a hard working bastard :), not even such a big fan of A7F. If you need anything particular (like tidying any other work, polishing your nails, or giving you a cup of coffee), just call me up. The Mad Hatter (talk) 06:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page -- GunMetal Angel 05:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Yep, that's me!

That's my IP address correct, thanks for recommending me making an account, that would be a good idea if i'm going to keep on getting better at writing new articles/edits on the site. I found out that contributing on Wikipedia would be something fun to do, I've started alot of new topics in various articles on the Norwegian Wikipedia site, and other people have filled those out very well.

Anyway, I am still kind of new to the wikipedia community, so I hope the mistakes havn't been ruining anything, but I'm brand new and still learning. I am going to take a good look through the rules, terms etc. before continuing of course, and again, I'm very sorry for my mistakes.

But about having references, it's pretty hard to insert references to certain information, because most of these things I've talked about personally with Trent Hafdahl through mail, for instance the Ibanez RG7620 7-string guitar he uses. But I'll keep checking out for anything new about their gear etc. on the internet, and I'll make sure to switch out the references to actual articles on another website as fast as possible. And also of course, I'll practise my formal writing that is a quality factor on Wikipedia, making sure everything looks proffesional etc.

Again, sorry for my mistakes, but it's a pleasure sharing what i know about After The Burial on their Wiki page. Thanks for being supportive! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristianTJ (talkcontribs) 20:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

In Fear and Faith

In Fear and Faith Jarred plays bass, Mehdi plays drums, Sean plays guitar, Scott does vox, Ramin plays guitar and piano. Yesterday at 3:22pm quote made by in fear and faith on THEIR facebook can we change their members now —Preceding unsigned comment added by D.shade5611 (talkcontribs) 23:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Okay, all I needed was a source, dude. -- GunMetal Angel 02:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Rollback userbox

Hi there! Just letting you know that I have removed your rollback userbox from your userpage, as you no longer have the userright and it could be misleading to new users. Thanks. --Addihockey10 e-mail 19:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Texas in July

I am not vandalizing their page. Others who have been attacking the bands facebook page keep making changes to it, so I keep changing it back then.153.42.172.209 (talk) 14:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Symphonies.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Symphonies.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Emmure vandalism

I have semiprotected Emmure for a week. Let me know if the problem continues after that. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Metalcore lede

I'd rather you discuss this with me than edit war about it, please. All I did was remove one word from the lede, "extreme." I don't think that's worth getting mad about. Navnløs (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

In any case, I'm done for the night. However, I encourage you to respond if you still have an issue with my edit and we can discuss it further. During that time I also wish to encourage you to not break Wikipedia's three-revert rule, which can lead to endless edit warring (from which no one benefits), and to leave the page as it is until we discuss this fully and come to some sort of consensus. Maybe we can start a discussion on the metalcore talk page and see what others have to say as well if you are still against my edit. All the best, Navnløs (talk) 10:37, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit fights

Gunmetal you have a real big problem with WP:NPOV and you know it. There have been a lot of edit fights with you about this. Multisourced genres or sometimes even other terms for the same genres, and yet your persistance for keepin' everything your way. I Often leave it after a while cause it doesn't really matter. Just stop warnings and try thinking more open to others' views.Solinothe Wolf 14:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't even know what you're talking about. If you're referring to the section directly up from this one, dude all I can really say about that is it's a revert of original research, not provoking an "edit fight" and also might I add that you tend to genre war a lot when I've negotiated with you several times about it. We can be pals but it's just hard to maneuver when you continuously change or add genres to pages which are actually not sourced at all. -- GunMetal Angel 17:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Its plastered all over youtube and metal music websites, research yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nevereverdreamforever (talkcontribs) 04:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

What? Well even though I don't know what you're referring to, YouTube is not a source and as for metal music websites, all what says "djent" is is some movement for prog metal and is not a genre. Maybe you should be the one doing the research. - GunMetal Angel 07:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Black Veil Brides edits.

You have incorrect genres listed. They are not 'post-hardcore' or 'metalcore' nor are the listed under List of post-hardcore bands so stop editing it in. I can see many people are having issues with you pertaining editing, so do research before you persist on the editing of a band's page instead of insisting on an editing war with me. AlexanderBVB 20:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

There are not "many people having issues" with my editing, just you who doesn't even have a source or discussion involved with changing the genres and another person who just got blocked for obviously having communication issues by personal attacking me and several other users. If you don't stop changing the genres, I'm going to have to report you too, man. It's not my choice, it's what the sources say and that's what Wikipedia is based on, not opinions. Almost everywhere BVB is listed as post-hardcore or gothic glam metalcore. -- GunMetal Angel 20:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Alright, i just try and keep the page clean and in context of what most of the sources i've seen have said. Sorry for the misunderstanding.! AlexanderBVB 20:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
THANK YOU! I'm so glad to have someone understand now, so much chaos has happened on that page and you could have fooled me you were just like that Joker user and would go out with a good long block. Sorry if it seemed like I was threatening you, I mean I'm only on here just to ensure stuff gets right. -- GunMetal Angel 21:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
No problem.! it irritates me how tons of people go on there and add wrong or vandalizing material like they think they own the page or know stuff without research. It's all good, and i am too.! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexanderBVB (talkcontribs) 05:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Regarding "The Death Of Greeley Estates"

I just copied the genres from previous albums, I just did that cause I hate trying to figure out genres, I dont even know the genres anymore, and it's not their 3rd album, if you follow their discography they have at least 3-4 other Full albums with one EP. As for the image it's all I had and I would appriciate it if you upload another picture if the current one gets deleted or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecruz10111 (talkcontribs) 02:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ice Nine Kills for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ice Nine Kills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Nine Kills (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fezmar9 (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Ice Nine Kills

Thanks for your involvement in writing about Ice Nine Kills, their page here is long overdue. I have been a huge fan for a long time. The reason I keep changing certain thing is because they are inaccurate. For instance:

-the band was formed by both Jeremy Schwartz and Spencer Charnas. It keeps ONLY crediting Charnas with founding the band. -the song "the simple act of giving up," was not souly written by Jeremy Schwartz but also by Spencer Charnas. So I keep trying to fix that. - I keep trying to point out that the movie "Dishdogz" they were involved with was a "Lionsgate" movie. As you know, the inclusion of Ice Nine on wikipedia is up for debate, so the more high profile attachments we can put in there the better. Lionsgate is a very well known, huge movie studio.

I'm also trying to phrase things more professionally, the article is written well, but there are a few issues here and there. Please trust me on the facts, I am an expert when it comes to this band:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.36.67 (talk) 19:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

This is Jinxx from Black Veil Brides

Please quit changing my name to my birth name on here. I don't go by that, I haven't gone by that for years, even my mom calls me "Jinxx." If you were any fan of the band, you should know this. I would appreciate if you would respect me and my wishes. Thanks. Also, Andy never played keyboards or bass for the band. Don't know where you're getting some of this info. Jinxxed4life (talk) 22:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Okay, if you're actually Jinxx, I just gotta say man, loved the set at Extreme Thing (my dad took pictures of that show) and furthermore, we don't go by aliases rather than actual names. Although in this case if that's what you want I don't exactly see how to address this situation. I mean are you saying you don't want your real name on the article? -- GunMetal Angel 22:39, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, this is really Jinxx. I'm in my hotel room in Copenhagen right now, and last time I looked in the mirror, I was still me lol. Real names are the names we go by, and in my case, my name is Jinxx. My girlfriend calls me that, my band mates call me that, even my mom calls me that. I haven't gone by "Jeremy" for many years. I won't even respond to it. I detest my last name, as it's my father's name and me and the old man aren't exactly friends. But enough of my personal life, I would just really appreciate it if you kept my name "Jinxx." It gets really annoying when I do an interview with Guitar World or something and then they look at your wiki and print my old name in the article and then fans start calling me that. If you check my twitter I'm constantly correcting people about that. Thanks again, and glad you enjoyed our set at Extreme Thing. Take care. Jinxxed4life (talk) 23:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't see an issue with it. I mean look at the article for Avenged Sevenfold, you don't see Brian "Synyster Gates" Haner Jr., or Zachary "Zacky Vengeance" Baker, I could be wrong, but I don't think I've ever seen anyone try to change it to that either. - Jer757 23:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
If that's what you want. -- GunMetal Angel 00:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

IP summary

Gunmetal Angel, I'm not going to template you, but I am going to tell you that this edit summary is completely unacceptable. After 20,000 edits, and after being insulted yourself a couple of times, you should know better than this, no matter how silly you think the edit you reverted is. OK? Thanks. Drmies (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

It's not a personal attack. It's just describing how ridiculous something is wherein I've seen even admins do similar things. I didn't talk on this person's sexual preference, call him anything, write "fuck you" or anything of that standard. If anyone can use the phrase "are you on drugs?" and not have it come up in a vulgar way, then that is really no different from that type of phrase. The personal attack form of that sentence would be more like calling him retarded or saying he has some other type mentally unstable person, yet I'm not the one to do that hence to be honest, I'm not such a fan of the R-word and would find an edit summary such as this a lot more offensive then simply saying "whatever you're on, up the dosage" which was even printed in a video game magazine in-response to a fan letter for goodness sake. It is not a personal attack!-- GunMetal Angel 18:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
So someone insulted you a year ago. What does that have to do with this? What you said was unacceptable, pure and simple. You'd get a lot farther with a "hey I was angry and I won't do it again" or something like that. And not anyone can use the phrase "are you on drugs?"--it's not polite conversation. "HAHAHAHAHAHA, what ever you're taking, up the dosage, okay?" is NOT OK. It's childish and inappropriate, simple as that, and I am asking you--politely!--to not use that kind of language again. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I'm already aware that the comment was issued over a year ago, but that wasn't my point, nor was I even insulted by it. My point was I'm not finding this near as bad as you say, it's not even my words but what I found in an edited magazine years ago. But if it's what you want. -- GunMetal Angel 21:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Black Veil Brides

Dan here with Black Veil Brides management. Please do not change any factual corrections I have made to their page. All of the changes have been approved by the band and facts have been verified by Andy and our legal team. Please contact me with any questions you may have Dan@mercenarymanagement.com . Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeAwareX1 (talkcontribs) 10:08, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Careful, sir. That is bordering on violating Wikipedia's policies on legal threats, WP:LEGAL. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 10:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
So much drama on that page it makes Degrassi jealous... GunMetal Angel 08:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Bassist for The Word Alive

Daniel Shapiro IS NOW the bass player for "The Word Alive". (site: Facebook page and their myspace) Verifiable — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.118.160.70 (talk) 14:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Alright then, bro -- GunMetal Angel 11:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Dr. Acula image

Hello, Gunmetal Angel. You have new messages at MC10's talk page.
Message added 22:18, 15 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

mc10 (t/c) 22:18, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

forget it

Human consensus is apparently not enough on the Chimaira article, have it your way, but know you've left the page incorrect and in conflict with the views of several users. — Scythe 2:48, 17 Jun 2011 (UTC) 02:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

I only did what the sources said. Those sources are written by people too, I'll also have you know that you seem to be the only person to ever alter those genres in the infobox for that article after having a look at the history other than some weird IP addresses that would delete everything and change it to "emo metal" or something like that which sure hasn't happened in the past 2 years or so. • GunMetal Angel 08:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Read my first edit summary – the consensus is on the talk page. There is no support other than source for groove/metalcore/death, the talkpage is full of people saying the genres are wrong. I assumed consensus (as I said,) which is fine. — Scythe 2:21, 18 Jun 2011 (UTC) 02:21, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Marilyn Manson's eight studio album

Why did you rename it to Christianity Manufactures Yesterday's Killers? The band has yet to announce or confirm the title. I know he made mention of the phrase in Rapeture but that is not confirmation. At the moment, calling it that simply amount to speculation. I am reverting it back. -Red marquis (talk) 21:57, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Source for Tyler "Telle" Smith's authorship of "Apoligician" and "Lights and Stones"

In 2011, Smith wrote and completed two new songs for The Word Alive being named "Apoligician" and "Lights and Stones" for the deluxe edition of Deceiver, which was released on June 7, 2011.

Currently, this sentence has a source of http://highwiredaze.com/twanews1. However, looking at that article, it doesn't clearly say that Smith wrote the two song, just that they are new. Am I missing something?

For now, erring on the side of caution, I'm going to remove the sentence.

Thanks.—C45207 | Talk 05:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

He writes the lyrics to all their songs. The source is there in plain for the fact that the deluxe of edition of Deceiver is out. Chill, dude. • GunMetal Angel 06:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
"He writes the lyrics to all their songs." Sorry to sound like a broken record, but is there a source for this? This seems like a good statement to include in the bio. Thanks. —C45207 | Talk 08:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I put the CYK info back: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ryan_Dunn&diff=435297150&oldid=435297038.

Acronyms are commonly explained, and the full name of his early career group is both sourced and relevant and revealing about both the group's and his own daredevil, risk-taking nature. Ocaasi t | c 16:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Already read the summary. Thanks for explaining =) • GunMetal Angel 16:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I notice that some of your talk page comments and edit summaries are a bit unfriendly. While you keep an eye on the article, would you try and assume good faith and remain civil, even when other editors made a mistake? Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 17:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
I wasn't trying to be unfriendly, it's just I sometimes add-in humor (not to be taken too seriously) to describe what I'm feeling in everyday talk and since everyone that uses this site is human, I thought it could be understood in that matter. But ya know, it's a morning for me with not much rest so I don't know if crankyness is subconsciously causing me to come off like that or what, but yeah no problem. I'll keep more quiet about things. • GunMetal Angel 17:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
I see you're trying to be lighthearted about it. Unforunately--really--humor often doesn't translate well in text. Thanks for taking a look at it. Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 18:23, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gunmetal Angel. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page.
Message added 20:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dabomb87 (talk) 20:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Well

I edited the After the Burial one because I didn't see any links to an article for genres. I can post a link that proves what i put is correct, but Didn't see a section for it so decided to put what was correct. I'm still new to editing so yeah, but there was no articles that i saw that proved what i replaced — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skramblez (talkcontribs) 03:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Like I said, usually this needs to be discussed and with your history of me already having to revert and afterward complain to you about not vandalizing articles like The Black Dahlia Murder all because you think the band is not deathcore which makes that a "fact" in your eyes shouldn't be done, I thought the same tension would be brought to a band like After the Burial. All I'm saying is, genre warring is pretty disruptive, I end up having to revert stuff like that all the time, but if you have a source, please bring it to the talk page for After the Burial and I'll take a look at it & if it meets the source standards for an addition, I can do that. I'll add-in deathcore if your source meets reliable standards with no problem. • GunMetal Angel 03:12, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
I was talking about After the Burial, as I have not touched the Black Dahlia Murder page since. As for After the Burial I switched it because there was no article stating they played metalcore and I have one stating they play deathcore, and since I'm new to this I didn't know where to put it. There is no article that says they play it so stop getting mad and bear with me as all I'm doing is helping — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skramblez (talkcontribs) 03:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Just go to the talk page and post the source (the link), we'll go from there. And seeing as you're new, I'll drop by you a welcome template so you can understand stuff on here clearer. • GunMetal Angel 03:23, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Pierce the Veil

Are you re-adding progressive rock to the genre box? It is a post-hardcore band, plain and simple. Please stop, doing so is only misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.216.37 (talk) 07:13, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

They are credited as progressive rock, the band is barely different from Coheed and Cambria minus the vocals and they match-up to being within the same prog audience by what a reviewer has said. • GunMetal Angel 07:23, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Where exactly are they credited as progressive rock? And whether or not they are similar to Coheed and Cambria makes no difference and neither does the fact that they share the same audience; f.e. many prog enthusiasts love the works of Dead Can Dance, but they are purely a world folk band. Perhaps the tag "Experimental Rock" is more fitting. 66.229.216.37 (talk) 20:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Genre Changes

Hello, I appreciate the notice and concern, surrounding my changing of listed genres of artists. In the Sleeping with Sirens article in particular, I apologize for capitalizing the three subsequent genres; that was a mistake. However, you have stated that these recente changes "have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made." In fact, the change I made was from post-hardcore, which iself had no source at all. I do not wish to get in a genre battle; I find the tendency of many of our contemporaries to do so quite insipid. I merely saw that their genre was listed as post-hardcore, and, upon hearing to them for the first time today, thought that their sound and the listed genre were most definitely not in accord. Hence, I searched for a source online that would more accurately describe their sound. I found an article on Alternative Press, that listed genres such as "screamo," "pop," and "emo/metalcore." I ergo changed the genre in the article to match what was published in the source. Alternative Press was most certainly the most reputable and verifiable of sources I could find. Choices like MySpace, Facebook, and even Absolute Punk, are not nearly so. I thank you for your concern; I know we have a common goal of making Wikipedia the best we can make it. Starvinsky (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Chimaira ∞ The Age of Hell.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chimaira ∞ The Age of Hell.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Reversion of edits at Iwrestledabearonce

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism , such as the edit at Iwrestledabearonce, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. – SudoGhost 17:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Here's one for ya

[1]. I lawled. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 00:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:StW•Kill the Crown LP.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:StW•Kill the Crown LP.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

your changes to Dr. Aculas page

I believe you have taken the last edits as vandalism, however this event actually happened. So there's no need to keep removing facts from the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gosc11 (talkcontribs) 21:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

I created the Dr. Acula article months ago and kept & eye on it since and I don't think anyone is going to believe that a grown man got beat down by a teenager, so sorry I guess for having it seem like it's vandalism by common sense. However; not only is it not sourced but it's it's also totally irrelevant. If you seriously think putting something so irrelevant on that on the page needs to be done, then why don't we put on the article for tacos how my dog enjoys eating them or we could write how Seth MacFarlane doesn't like Dr Pepper? • GunMetal Angel 21:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Another User Notified...

Hey there, I wanted to let you know that another user has been notified after evaluation of the article, Breathe Carolina. You can see the history of that article if you wish to, but if so, go to the user before you have reverted that user's last edit. CHAK 001 (talk) 02:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

What are you talking about? • GunMetal Angel 03:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
I am referring to the last reverting edit that you have done (click here for the notice; for the revision history, click here, since that is after I looked at the article). Also, I forgot to mention that I did leave you an editor's review, so if you have time, you can look at it. Furthermore, the next time that you do an editor's review, I would suggest that you put the "editor's review" template not only on your talk page, but also on your user page. I tend to do that on my talk page only if I do request one (currently, I do not as of now). CHAK 001 (talk) 04:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Okay? That guy didn't vandalize the article by any means but yeah thanks for the review nonetheless. • GunMetal Angel 09:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Genre warriors

Could I trouble you to use the {{uw-genre1}} series for genre warriors rather than the generic uw-vand series? Using the latter isn't remotely helpful to the editor's understanding of how they're violating policy. Thanks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

But there is no level 4 • GunMetal Angel 16:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
There is. There's no 4im, but there is a level 4. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Trivium

We decided on the talk page that we would leave the main description as "heavy metal". Genre warriors were fighting over whether they were "metalcore" or "thrash". --Confession0791 talk 20:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gunmetal Angel. You have new messages at Cimanyd's talk page.
Message added 14:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry about that. Dynamic|cimanyD (talk|klat) 14:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Another message. ...Dynamic|cimanyD... (talk|klat) 14:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
2 weeks. ☺ ...Dynamic|cimanyD... (talk|klat) 15:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Pertaining to Design the Skyline

I would like to wonder where you are getting this evidence/information that Design the Skyline passes the criteria for a notable artist. To me, it seems as if you are dismissing an insightful and necessary discussion on the legitimacy of this band at this point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meatface 91 (talkcontribs) 18:16, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

"I would like to wonder"? Okay... "Dismissing an insightful and necessary discussion"..... Are you just using larger words instead of getting to a real point? All I wrote in that edit summary was that the band follows the same criteria passage that Rebecca Black made it through. Not real necessary to try to get all technical over. • GunMetal Angel 18:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

This was not vandalism, and clearly comes under the category of a good faith edit. Please bear that in mind given the volatile nature of editing on this page. There is also no need to establish consensus before making a change (although it is considered polite), under the Bold, Revert, Discuss rules – He was bold, you reverted, now discuss – none of that is vandalism, just because it goes against your own point of view. a_man_alone (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Genre changes are considered vandalism by many and he should know he was being a disruption after spending some time on here per evident of his edits. Also: it's not like I gave him a vand template on his talk page, but a genre-change one. • GunMetal Angel 11:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
No, but you used twinkle which specifically classes the edit as vandalism, when it was not. AGF, BRD. a_man_alone (talk) 12:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Repeat vandals

I just blocked a friend of yours. FWiW, if you come across vandals/genre warriors I've blocked before (hey, even one that's been blocked by another admin), don't bother giving them more warnings, bring them straight to me and I'll block them (I wouldn't go through AIV, someone might complain that you didn't warn them even though a block is a pretty clear cease and desist!). Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi.

Hey man lay off me i'm 11 years old and trying to edit wikipedia. i'm still young and learning how to use wiki so plz back off.. SomedayCameSuddenly (talk) 02:38, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

LOL! You can tell that to your mom. I gave you more than enough reasoning on trying to use it and I was happy as can be when you said you were giving up on trying because you're wasting everyone's time reverting your disruptions. • GunMetal Angel 02:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
(Personal attack removed) i want to contrbute but i cant when people keep reverting my edits. SomedayCameSuddenly (talk) 02:44, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Genre change

Genre change
Rock is of course the mother genre,& as you'v said 'they'v many non-metal songs' it doesnt make any sense,Damnation is their only non-metal album to date,a progressive rock album,but they are primarily a heavy metal band with numerous influences. Metalvayne (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
👍 Gunmetal Angel likes this. — but keep in mind, I made a talk page thread about this, go take part in that rather than edit war, please. I'd hate to see you end up getting in trouble for something really dumb. • GunMetal Angel 19:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

genre introduction

firstly,your talk page about Opeth is so full of fallacies and your points dont make any sense at all.I agree that there would be conflicts over the Heavy metal term,so its better to introduce them as a progressive metal band,that would fit perfectly,in fact it has always been there on wiki,before your appearance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalvayne (talkcontribs) 20:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Why are you writing this here and making a new section about it? Go tell this to the Opeth talk page, this is not a place for that debate. • GunMetal Angel 01:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

big chocolate deletion

why did you delete my post about big chocolate? I was going to put that he dies a twitter death and people should not be concered because he is still alive — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editoooor (talkcontribs) 17:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Why did you undo the message from 86.174.131.73 (talk) on the talk page? Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 19:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Because it's pointless genre complaining/warriorizing and doesn't help in assisting the article as what it's for. • GunMetal Angel 19:55, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Far from genre warring, not like he actually changed the genre, he was just offering his two cents on the talk page. - Jer757 19:57, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
It's better than just going into the article and changing it, especially if it's disputed. Dynamic|cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 20:00, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Tallback

Hello, Gunmetal Angel. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Did you get my reply?

Haha, I'm so new to this shit I don't know if when replying to you, I'm just supposed to edit and type below your previous message or what, but that's what i did - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerryricochet (talkcontribs)

Design The Skyline

Nice job on the article, man. Not particularly fond of the band myself, but it's nice to see an article so well maintained on a band everyone loves to hate. - Jer757 20:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

If Rebecca Black has a stable article I felt this band this band needed one as well since it's the same exact case. I also ended up being friends with a lot of the members, particularly Keebler who even checked the article moments after the night I wrote it. Thanks for the comments. =) • GunMetal Angel 22:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

About the Abandon All Ships article

Why do you keep changing one of the sections's title back to "Departure of the Paiano Brothers"? The section is describing everything important that happened after Geeving was released, not just the departure of the Paiano Brothers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salamibears58 (talkcontribs) 01:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

It's the most noable thing about the section and most the text is about that departure, having it's titled that it's after the release of Geeving is totally obvious and not necessary at all. • GunMetal Angel 01:44, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Well there's unnecessarily there's too much information about that. I still vote Post-Geeving. Salamibears58 (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Salamibears58
Wikipedia doesn't work based on votes, its a consensus amongst editors that leads to a decision. I've reverted the article back to the form before you (Salamibear58) edited it, if you want your changes to stay, post on the articles talk page and wait for replies. PS. Sorry about hijacking your talk page, GmA. - Jer Hit me up 20:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

It's totally cool, you're always welcome for inputs. • GunMetal Angel 21:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Talk: Trivium

While I don't actually care that you reverted that back, That guy was blocked for vandalizing that article, amongst others shortly before making that talk page edit, in fact the IP he used that time was also just blocked for sock puppeting. Considering he was blocked after I made the Sockpuppet investigation, I'd say the admin who blocked him agreed it was vandalism as well. - Jer757 01:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I wouldn't be too certain, man. That IP traces to LA, LA has a ton of people more than most places in the world, Trivium is a popular band and notice that these two IPs have totally different edits. One vandalized and yes, should have been blocked, but the other only did one talk page edit yet you're convicting the other one as being a sock based on a talk page thread all because another one vandalized an album of their's along with several other bands? That doesn't seem to add-up, but I guess if that's what you suspect. • GunMetal Angel 04:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
I understand what you're saying dude, but think about it like this. This dude edits the talk page almost immediately after the other IP is blocked, and in his edit he mentions both TWA and Trivium (both of which the former IP vandalized). I understand that its common for IPs to be similar because its such a large place, but these two IPs were almost identical besides the last digit, which is usually the result of an assigned IP range by your ISP, you can release/renew it or even turn off your router for a few minutes and it'll change your ip. Jer Hit me up 14:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
After reviewing your detective work once more I'm starting to really see it now, and also after taking another look at the IP address' edits I'm just going to put this out there that I find this funny as hell even though it is vandalism AHAHAHAHA • GunMetal Angel 02:45, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
I lol'd when I seen that one, most people who vandalize post the same shit everyone else does, but that guy got pretty creative, lol. Jer Hit me up 03:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

RFC

I'm having a few issues with a particular editor, and I'm not entirely sure what the best approach is; I was wondering whether you could take a look. The issue is essentially this: said user generically dislikes list articles, preferring categories (despite long-standing consensus that the two are not mutually exclusive). To this end they nominated a bunch of the metal lists for deletion, although they subsequently admitted that they were looking for clean-up; examples are here, here and here. They also have a problem with artist nationality being recorded in llist articles (for example, this edit), although curiously they have no issue with date of formation being listed. The list articles were all kept following AfD, so their new tactic appears to be to delete everything without a source, which is fair enough if the editor has looked for sources themselves, but in this instance appears to be a pointed attempt to blank pages since they didn't get their own way at AfD. The latest, and most baffling altercation concerns the newly renamed (unilaterally by editor in question) list of Swedish death metal artists. Their unusual argument is that there is some huge distinction between a Swedish death metal band and a Swedish death metal band, although it is unclear where they have gleaned this distinction from. Nonetheless, I have done due diligence and found sources for everything on the list (initially Allmusic, although I have pointed said editor towards print sources (Daniel Ekeroth's Swedish Death Metal, Albert Mudrian's Improbable History, Terrorizer death metal specials etc.) but this particular chap is just removing all the sourced content (e.g this edit. A quick look at the talk page gives you a fairly clear idea of how they approach consensus-building; the "new inclusion criteria" have apparently been decided by him and him alone, and it far from clear exactly what they are. This kind of editing is essentially disruptive, but I'm not exacctly sure who to take the issue to... what do you reckon? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Try going to an admin (ex: HJ Mitchell) with the same message you've posted here. I didn't look at everything, but from the looks of it, this guy is basically on the same level as a genre warrior, maybe an admin can talk some sense in to him. -Jer Hit me up 15:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
My god, what a disruptive bloke that just comes barging in on this site, rearranges a bunch of content, just to intentionally kill the nature of the nature of what everyone has going on here… and in the end: tries to jumble up what he's really trying to do with comments like "Herp derp, guuuhhh dis sourceee needz to be betterrr." Yes, take this to HJ, I can totally feel your frustration just by reading this. • GunMetal Angel 19:11, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CGlp2alt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CGlp2alt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Iwrestledabearonce style

Hey I just wanted to say thank you for the grammar tweeks you made to the edit i made onto Iwrestledabearonce musical style section, i couldn't quite figure how to mention Krysta Cameron vocal style in the text. Jonjonjohny (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

KPVM-LP

To answer your question (posted in your edit summary), -LP means "Low Power" and is used by the Federal Communications Commission and can be confirmed in the station's listing on the FCC website. Please do not move pages to incorrect titles, as you did here, just before you don't understand what they mean. I have requested the page be moved back to "KPVM-LP" per naming standards. - NeutralhomerTalk • 12:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

It wasn't so much my decision other than the fact that I just have a particular person in my family that works at that specific station at high class and many others felt that it was incorrect having those letters in the title. Even the website does not have "LP" listed in its name if you wanna go by source standards and not original research. But I guess it's okay, if the Transition website has it listed as that even though I'm sure it's just a notation in its listing (which shouldn't affect its actual name) • GunMetal Angel 14:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Due to naming standards, we have to go by what the FCC says, not the station. For example, last week, WMAL-FM (still WVRX at that point) was ID'ing as "WMAL-FM", but still "WVRX" according to the FCC. We couldn't change it until the FCC did. So, we do everything (radio or television) according to the FCC website. Which says KPVM is a low-power Class A station, not full power (which would give it a -TV or -DT callsign) like WCBS-TV or KLAS-TV. More-than-likely, the KPVM callsign will move over to channel 46 soon and it will probably be KPVM-LD (Low (Power) Digital), not KPVM-DT. - NeutralhomerTalk • 14:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the mistake

As pointed out by another user, it was an error. The warning was meant to go the IP user. That being said, let's try to keep the communication civil. OK? NJZombie (talk) 00:21, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm just in a crap mood, not what I needed =| • GunMetal Angel 00:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Well, it's corrected now. No harm done. NJZombie (talk) 00:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry dude • GunMetal Angel 00:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Asking Alexandria

Yo dude, whats up with the "Before the War" redirect? Bit puzzled on why that links to AA. Jer Hit me up 03:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I don't get it either but it's whatever. • GunMetal Angel 03:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Yea, lol. I seen it and I was just like.. What? Jer Hit me up 03:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

EMMURE EDIT

Excuse me, today is his birthday and I just talked to him and he personally told me that he no longer is in Emmure and said that since the band will not inform their fans, he will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrayingDeath (talkcontribs) 18:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your word means nothing to wikipedia, without a verifiable source, it can't be added. Jer Hit me up 19:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I don't know if you can read, I just said I TALKED TO THE ACTUAL DRUMMER. Do you want me to screen cap it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrayingDeath (talkcontribs) 19:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

See WP:SOURCE, nobody cares if you "ACTUALLY TALKED TO HIM ZOMGGG ASJHDBASFJBSD". That's not how things work here. • GunMetal Angel 19:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Saying something happened does not make it true. No one here has any proof of what you said. →Dynamic|cimanyD← (contact me) 20:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Here's proof http://www.flickr.com/photos/68355525@N02/6218394826/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrayingDeath (talkcontribs) 20:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


I would very much enjoy if you would now let my edit stay on the page please since I have proof that he is no longer with Emmure--PrayingDeath (talk) 00:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TAIM the Infinite Death EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TAIM the Infinite Death EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Vlad

I caught on that it was a sockpuppet, but that falcon dude seemed like he didn't wanna block him for obvious vandalism because you only gave him one warning. :p Jer Hit me up 17:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

You'll love the reply to his block. Jer Hit me up 18:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
» » » [2] « « « • GunMetal Angel 18:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
I wouldn't have reported him to AIV if I didn't think he should be blocked. The one warning message is automatically appended by Huggle. Falcon8765 (TALK) 18:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Well he just got blocked indefinitely now per his response to his block being considered a legal threat, even though he should have been indefinitely blocked for completely other reasons in the first place. LOLWUT? This is a hilarious turn of events all basing off of little ol' Design the Skyline. Did you know, I actually have Keebler's phone number? I may wanna text him this, because let's just be honest. This is freaking good. x) • GunMetal Angel 18:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
@Falcon: Ah, never used huggle, I thought you typed that message.
@GMA: That would be an amazing conversation starter, "Dude, someone just threatened to sue wikipedia because of your band, LOL". Jer Hit me up 22:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
You may want to check out VladtheBlackEmperor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) :) Tgeairn (talk) 01:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for making Wikipedia a better place to be with your amazing contributions. May this cup of coffee energize you to do even more! Pinkstrawberry02 talk 01:22, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please reply on my talk page. Also don't forget to sign my guestbook!

👍 Gunmetal Angel likes this.GunMetal Angel 18:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

"Electronica"

(Re: Your post on my talk page) "Electronica" is purely a media buzzword for Electronic Listening Music, such as Ambient, Downtempo, IDM stuff. There are people out there who will agree with me. Salamibears58 (talk) 01:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Salamibears58

0idsrrrrrrreup98a4ruwridflusdhmry93784693w478weyo8uawe9rfwpr4ya9wey4rawe79urpawero0iwe058usw49857yoweurseryoiwefwe8fcr0wo4t57f4yw7zs80cf4y Salamibears58 (talk) 11:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Salamibears58
Alright, if we can't have "Electronic Music", let's be extremely specific on those articles. Salamibears58 (talk) 11:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Salamibears58

The Music Barnstar

The Music Barnstar
For your help with reverting multiple sock puppets with COI in a genre edit war at Eleventyseven, I hereby award you The Music Barnstar. Thanks for sticking to your guns! Royalbroil 12:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I have semiprotected the article to force them to discuss instead of making sockpuppets to push their agenda in this edit war. There's room for discussion on how to deal with their issue. Royalbroil 12:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Why thank you so much. I've never had a barnstar. Guess I finally got what I deserved after four years of music editing on here entirely out of hobby. • GunMetal Angel 17:34, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
You're welcome, you earned it! I'm glad that I gave it to someone who is appreciative and probably should have gotten one a long time ago. I hope you give one out to someone else when you see them doing a fine job with something. You find the barnstars at WP:BARNSTAR. Royalbroil 00:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

One Morning Left

Damn dude, I've been to hell and back looking for info on this band, I can't seem to find anything useful at all. Have you had any luck? Jer Hit me up 17:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Not really, your interview source does help though. If you want, just start creating the history on my sandbox and I'll go from there. I have some really bad music to tie up with at the momento. • GunMetal Angel 17:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Yea, been trying to figure out how the hell to go about that. Have no idea how to mention former members when I don't even know when they were in the band, or even what their full names are, lol. Jer Hit me up 18:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
I have some of the members added on FB, maybe I'll harass them. I already asked their screamer days ago on how they got their band name and he went about explaining (in semi-poor English) that he did not chose the name, their old drummer did who he isn't too fond of (or ever was friends with for that matter), so not only does he not know the origin of their name, he also doesn't even know the founding drummer's name. Geez >_< • GunMetal Angel 18:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Haha! Yea that interview I linked said the same thing basically, they just decided to use it cause no other band was named "One Morning Left" I guess. Hopefully you can get the members to answer some questions, would make this so much easier. Jer Hit me up 18:57, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

AA

I reverted that, because while I myself even agree listing their birth names would be better, It seems like more so than not, the members are listed by the names they go by. ex: M. Shadows from Avenged Sevenfold, or Jinxx from Black Veil Brides.

Is there any actual guideline for listing members names? Jer Hit me up 17:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Nah, I just thought it was a good idea, but have it back to have it was if you may. • GunMetal Angel 17:32, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi

How exactly can I verify genre changes to certain artists that I make? I also tried to add Marilyn Manson to the Industrial Rock category, and that was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaxwes (talkcontribs) 22:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The content needs to be sourced, however, it would be best just not to fiddle with genres and be more accurate to discuss them on the talk page's for the articles instead before making action. This gives everyone an easier time because usually genre changes are reverted. There's a lot of music genres out there and people have an eye on opinion for what type of music their favorite bands play, then there's us who have to revert these people and it's pretty annoying as you would have guessed. So save us the trouble. Also, I don't think you've seemed to have gotten a welcome template since the creation of your account, I'll drop you one so you can take the time to read up on the guidelines for this site to see how stuff works. • GunMetal Angel 22:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Emmure page

Bless the Fall spells their name "blessthefall" ... do not change it Homie C (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Why are you putting this on his page? Pretty sure he's well aware of this. - Jer Hit me up 23:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia doesn't do funny spellings. I already once explained MOS:TM. • GunMetal Angel 00:04, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Oh I see, you capitalized the b. GMA already told you, but I'm going to tell you again just so we all know you did it! Have a look at MOS:TM and don't change it back to the lowercase form! -Jer Hit me up 00:10, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

INFAF

I started something in my sandbox, curious if you're interested in using this? If so I was wondering if you could help out with more precise dates than what I've currently got. INFAF Timelime -Jer Hit me up 22:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

I noticed one big mistake, you have a release tamed in 2008, when they never had an album in '08, it was '07 (the December of that year) when the Voyage EP was released onto iTunes. Also, if you wanna go even before that, they have a four-track demo that was recorded and released in high school during 2006. • GunMetal Angel 16:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
If you look close, the line is actually just before 2008 (December as you said), also curious if you know an exact date on the InFAF demo? I did actually intend on adding it, but I couldn't find an exact date. -Jer Hit me up 16:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

As a gift for breaking 30,000 edits, I give you this awesome little kitten!

Jer Hit me up 04:39, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry

Yeah I realized that after putting about 20 bands in that category lmao..xD sorry. Sensesfail123 (talk) 00:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Breathe Carolina

That's how discographies are supposed to be formatted. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 16:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Question

Why'd you remove the source I added for pop punk on Hawthorne Heights? Jw Sensesfail123 (talk) 02:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

He removed it because it's already sourced in the Musical Style and classification section. Jer Hit me up 02:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)