User talk:Indigogate

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Indigogate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 00:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. by the way, can you edit Ice Age: Collision Course? because the voices of Gavin and Gertie haven't been confirmed. Indigogate talk 06:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ice Age: Collision Course, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem solved Indigogate talk 14:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Please be careful when creating new categories that there doesn't already exist a category that is serving the same purpose. For example, Category:Monster films just duplicates Category:Monster movies which already fully populated. If you use HotCat, it will alert you if the category you are looking for exists and will prompt you to select from among similarly named categories based on the words you type in. This is one way to know whether a new category is warranted.
Some of the categories you have created duplicate existing categories so I will proposing deletion at WP:CFD which you should not take personally. You are a new editor and it would be unusual if you were fully aware of the existing category structure on Wikipedia which is enormous. If you are interested in categorization, I encourage you to visit CFD and participate in some of the discussions that occur there about category renames, mergers and deletions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Kailash29792. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ice Age: Collision Course has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please stop adding rumours per WP:RUMOUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Unconfirmed" # Not finally established, settled or confirmed. It means something that's not be announced yet Indigogate talk 07:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ice Age: Collision Course, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not add unsourced, unconfirmed roles to Wikipedia film articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry about that. Indigogate talk 17:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Peter Sam Fan | chat? 14:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of An American Holiday[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on An American Holiday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of An American Holiday for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article An American Holiday is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An American Holiday until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sybil (1976 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Captain America: Civil War, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Plot sections must not exceed 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT. You can use an online word counter tool such as https://wordcounter.net/ to measure the size of the plot section. Binksternet (talk) 07:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Don't Breathe (2016 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please don't copy and paste text from online sources such as https://www.sonyscreenings.com/main/registration_select/Qmxvb2R5RGlzZ3VzdGluZw%3D%3D ... Binksternet (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Bastille Day (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. http://www.odeon.co.uk/films/bastille_day/16632/ Binksternet (talk) 07:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You saw Civil War !!![edit]

When, where? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.249.181.85 (talk) 09:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm British, it comes out in my country on April 29th Indigogate (talk) 21:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC) Indigogate talk 21:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited An American Holiday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Found footage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Solved it. Indigogate (talk) 15:51, 19 April 2016 (UTC) Indigogate talk 15:51, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American science fiction fantasy films has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:American science fiction fantasy films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Can't Hold Us has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Based on your change, you seem to be saying the song was released in 2011 and no one had anything to say about it for two years. Then, it charted and no one seems to have mentioned how unusual it is for a song to gather dust for two years then shoot to number one.

That seems highly unlikely, as does your explanation for seeing Civil War a month early (because it will come out in your country in two more weeks). SummerPhD^v2.0 14:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ice Age: Collision Course. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD^v2.0 22:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Forthcoming films are a common target for vandals providing false cast lists. Without proper cites, it is nearly impossible to prevent such vandalism.

Per WP:V, one of our core policies, "any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." Consider this material to be challenged. If citations are not added for the material in the near future, I will remove it again. If you restore it without inline citations, you will be blocked from editing. Arguments in edit summaries to support small portions of the material are not a substitute for inline citations. SummerPhD^v2.0 04:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:V I am challenging the material. If these characters are going to appear in this upcoming film, we need a source. I have asked for sources. I have explained why we need sources. You have stated you don't care if they do not have a source.[1] Per WP:V, "...any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." You will need to provide inline citations for the material or establish a consensus to override our core policy to allow this unsourced material.

As you have reverted this several times without answering why you believe this challenged material does not need inline citations, I am providing the following note regarding our edit warring policy. - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:50, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Ice Age: Collision Course shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SummerPhD^v2.0 04:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, a bot malfunction seems to have given you a second second chance here.[2] - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was just trying to prove a point that my information is true but v2.0 wasn't listening to me and that he wanted the page his way, he is wrong, i am right, this isn't war, it's just us fighting over the page. It has to stop because I'm telling the truth. Indigogate (talk) 07:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC) Indigogate talk 07:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ice Age: Collision Course. Please stop reinserting mention of Captain Gutt insinuating that he's still alive unless you can provide Wikipedia:Reliable Sources that explain how he is still alive, and how that is relevant to the movie.--Mr Fink (talk) 15:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 08:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

See WP:SUPERCAT - we don't want to add higher level categories in a category tree when a lower level category already exists. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ice Age: Collision Course. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ice Age: Collision Course. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Its even worse when you add info using a fake reference for support. Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If Crash and Eddie are going to be in the film, there should be some reliable source somewhere that supports that. We want articles to be solidly supported with verifiable information. It is better to leave things out than put stuff in that can't be verified. There is no hurry with Wikepedia articles, better take our time and get it right. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indigogate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Crash & Eddie are in the film but couldn't find a proper reference as proof that they are appearing, I'm sorry about what i put in.

Decline reason:

You have been blocked multiple times for the same recurring issue. As such, I don't see any reason to unblock your account at this time. If you wish to edit constructively when the block expires, please make sure to include reliable sources with your edits. Thanks, Nakon 03:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Ice Age: Collision Course, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indigogate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I removed content from the page without permission to do so because i was trying to correct the infomation on it. I'm so sorry for meddling on the page and i won't do it again

Decline reason:

You've been blocked four times in the past two months. Can you please explain how we can be sure this will never happen again given that it's happened over and over and over again up to this point? Yamla (talk) 16:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indigogate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I removed content from the page without permission to do so because i was trying to correct the information on it. I'm so sorry for meddling on the page and i won't do it again. I'm finished with that page. Even though I was doing my best, I just ended up violating the page. That's the reason why I'm not doing it again. To those of you who blocked me because of our troubled relationship over Ice Age: Collision Course. Please i want to be unblocked so i will never, ever, touch that page again. My crime of Disruptive editing has gone too far and i want to be forgiven and just leave that page alone. I will edit other pages as long as no one accuses me of that same vandalism crime. Thank you. Indigogate (talk) 10:54, 9 Jul 2016 (UTC) Indigogate talk 10:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your actions have been very stubborn, and you have totally refused to listen to anyone and you had to be physically stopped by being blocked (four times!) I've seen this kind of approach a lot here with some young people, and they only start promising to behave when they're grounded - and those promises are usually empty. I suggest you take six months off and enjoy the rest of the summer (and have a great time in Bristol - it's a beautiful city), and then come back and request an unblock via the WP:Standard Offer when you're sure you can behave in a more mature manner. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok thanks, six months is the best way possible. It really wasnt a good time to edit pages on wikipedie but thank you for giving me that option and i should be back in January 2017 to tell the truth. P.S. I'm seeing Ice Age 5 this August (when i visit Bristol) and I'll keep my hands off the Wikipedia page. Bye. Indigogate (talk) 13:54, 9 Jul 2016 (UTC) Indigogate talk 13:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Indigogate has apparently been evading his block through 86.19.217.161 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to Bristol![edit]

My mum said to me many weeks ago that she is gonna take me to the city of Bristol this summer! Isn't it great! Indigogate (talk) 10:04, 9 Jul 2016 (UTC) Indigogate talk 10:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Indigogate. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]