User talk:Kansascitt1225

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kansas City, Missouri have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Kansas City, Missouri[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Babymissfortune 02:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas City etymology[edit]

Kansas City, Missouri is named after it's location on the Kansas River. The River is named after the Kansa/Kaw tribe of Native Americans who lived in it's watershed. Kansas City, Kansas was named after Kansas City, Missouri when the latter's urban growth spilled over the state line. This is well established historical fact and continued edits to change this will likely result in an eventual ban. Thanks Grey Wanderer (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kansascitt1225. Thank you. Grey Wanderer (talk) 06:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 activity[edit]

Some rather strange comments were left on my talk page in 2021 (diff diff diff diff) seems to be Kansascitt1225. Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 activity[edit]

This comment was left on my talk page after I reverted a spree of edits to Johnson County, Kansas and other Kansas City metropolitan area articles. Grey Wanderer (talk) 23:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is for 6 months from now to prove I can respect my block. I would just appreciate a genuine response as I will no longer post this on talk pages as it’s disruptive. My main question is how is this biased, misleading, or false ? And how is this trolling ? Or how am I “not interested in building an encyclopedia” ? Or how am I being “single minded” and POV pushing. ?[edit]

Hi Administrators I’ve recently been on Reddit Wikipedia asking people what they think about my investigations case page. They tell me the best thing would be to stop editing while logged out and declare all my accounts (which I don’t have any others), then I have to show others that I can follow Wikipedia rules and policies. They said that I have to realize that the community is made by volunteers and time spent on me is less time you could be spending elsewhere therefore I don’t request you spending your time until 6 months from now. This is just so I can show my commitment to respecting my block when I ask for an unblock request. I would be ok if you stop reading here as I won’t be editing Wikipedia for 6 months and then will ask for an unblock request. When I first joined Wikipedia I stupidly made multiple accounts which I didn’t know was wrong and then got blocked as a sock puppet for it. Then if figured more recently if a made good edits I might get unblocked which I now realize was a terrible idea. I am the blocked editor from the the sock puppet case page here [Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kansascitt1225/Archive] and the Johnson County, Kansas page and Overland Park, Kansas pages. This case page has been thrown around in the description of removed edits on related pages and I can’t even seem to defend myself on my own case page [1][2]. I am a good faith editor and know that admins have to protect the pages because I am indefinitely blocked and that is wikipedias policies. I am being completely transparent. I am just curious as to why I have been called a compulsive liar and a troll, editing in bad faith and severely ill. There is somewhat of a border war between Kansas and Missouri for jobs. I am not trying to perpetuate is as one editor has claimed.[1] some people in Missouri and Kansas also strongly dislike Johnson County, KS as can be seen here in local city forums here.[2] Some of my things have been removed as biased misleading or false from before being blocked like this which is very well referenced except one of the links that doesn’t work anymore [3] and replaced with historical viewpoints like this [4] . Or the statements like this as being said to be false when they were very well referenced on this diff [5]. The person who claims that I have inserted the word Johnson county Kansas inappropriately into Info boxes has also done the exact same thing as can be seen here on the page of the man who segregated the city [6], simply when the page benefited the Missouri side saying “largely suburban Its proximity to Kansas City Missouri has led to population growth” with no reference and me adding it’s the most densely populated county is seen as wrong here being some pattern or goal.[7] I am curious why my edits have been removed since before I was even blocked. I know that the current ones are due to block evasion but the only reason I created socks to begin with is because when these things were removed as biased misleading or false to the point the page was protected as disruptive editing despite them being well referenced and neutral. The only reason I said “same person here” like on these diffs [8][9] is so other people knew I was the same person because my intent was never to deceive or to do sock-puppetry as my home doesn’t have wifi and I edit from public places having multiple ips. Other people sharing the same viewpoint as me are simply accused as being me as can be seen here [10] the only argument here is a historical viewpoint that Overland Park, Kansas is a bedroom community with detached single family homes designed to take commuters to downtown Kansas City, Missouri. When in fact there is less detached housing percentages in Overland Park, Kansas than Kansas City, Missouri. And overland parks population rises during the day due to commuting as can be seen here. [3][4] It is also more densely populated than and has less detached housing than Kansas City, Missouri.[5] [6] and this was removed as not being well referenced or not being a reliable source [11]. The person who originally reported me “grey wanderer” ; basically none of this persons edits are referenced unless it’s a history book. I have been told by others to “fuck off as can be seen here. [12]. The county and city of Overland Park is considered urban by the us census bureau but suburban by most locals in the KC area as can be seen here [7] as I tried presenting this in a neutral way. [13] Downtown Kansas City Missouri was completely abandoned 20 years ago and desolate and is now heavily subsided as you can see In this reference here [8]. I am also bothered by this edit that states that it’s the Kansas City, Missouri metropolitan area on the Kansas page referencing the talk page when it said nothing like this here [14] along with this edit that I tried to make more neutral and it was reverted as Jackson county being THE central county of the metropolitan area while having no reference for it whatsoever[15] when you can see in the census reference here there are actually 6 central counties and the official name is Kansas City MO-KS.[9] This user has said the metropolitan area is anchored by Kansas City Missouri here again with no reference completely excluding the Kansas side of the area against other edits from before me even being on Wikipedia [16][17]. I am curious if I ever have the chance of getting unblocked. I joined completely oblivious to how Wikipedia worked and vandalized. I have since learned how to reference properly and I have learned how Wikipedia works very slowly. I feel as though I have the competence required to edit and see thing from others points of view. My 2 requests after waiting for 6 months have either said my case was too severe or have gone stale due to no one responding. One on the unblock ticket request system and the other on the Midwestman1986 talk page. Can I please take Wikipedias standard offer after 6 months with no edits and get unblocked afterwards and not have my unblock requests be ignored? I have read about civility and want to be respectful to other editors and promise to stay away from the project for 6 months. These are just respectful questions as I curiously just want an answer. @Johnuniq:,@PhilKnight: @Yamla:,@Bbb23:,@Deepfriedokra: Kansascitt1225 (talk) 02:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC) Kansascitt1225 (talk) 02:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Kansas Missouri border war isn't over". Columbia Missourian. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
  2. ^ "why people don't like Johnson county". Reddit Kansas City. Retrieved 26 December 2023.
  3. ^ "Commuter-Adjusted Daytime Population: Places". US Census Bureau. Retrieved 16 December 2023.
  4. ^ "Overland Park Financial Report 2020". City of Overland Park. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  5. ^ "American housing survey housing characteristics". US Census. Retrieved 16 December 2023.
  6. ^ "population of Kansas City area by density". statistical atlas. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
  7. ^ "As Johnson County Grows, Should It Still Be Considered Suburban?". KCUR. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  8. ^ "How Kansas City Over-Subsidized Downtown". planetzen. Retrieved 22 December 2023.
  9. ^ "CORE BASED STATISTICAL AREAS (CBSAs), METROPOLITAN DIVISIONS, AND COMBINED STATISTICAL AREAS (CSAs), JULY 2023". US census. Retrieved 26 December 2023.
I for one don't care what people on Reddit think. All that matters on Wikipedia is what the editors of Wikipedia think. And taking Wikipedia concerns to Reddit is in extreme poor taste and is not appropriate. Thanks-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok that’s understandable. I just want to be part of the community someday. If my referenced information was removed as biased misleading or false I should have gone to dispute resolution, which I didn’t know existed then. I also should have been more civil afterwards instead of making personal attacks. Kansascitt1225 (talk) 03:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to request unblocking, you need to email the ArbCom as this is a check user block. (arbcom-en@wikimedia.org) Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to investigate the history at the moment because regardless of what opinion I might form, the next step is for you to not edit Wikipedia at all for six months. Feel free to ping me again after six months and I might be able to offer advice. If you do that, remind me that I commented here on 27 December 2023. Next time, headings are supposed to brief. Johnuniq (talk) 03:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Oh, six months from now? Is that tacit admission that you have evaded your block today? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And please. Don't ping me. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:29, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I realize this is my fault and if my edits were removed as being biased misleading or false in my eyes, I should have gone to dispute resolution instead of making other accounts. I did not know dispute resolution existed then and you wont be seeing me on Wikipedia until I edit this page in 6 months with this account. Kansascitt1225 (talk) 05:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not operating in good faith. For example, no disclosure of the most recent set of sockpuppet accounts and IP addresses involved. In any case, this user is de-facto banned by the community. See WP:CBAN and WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 11:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ping me again. Don't ping anyone. --Yamla (talk) 11:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I’m willing to accept that. I don’t want to be disruptive. I have no other socks to disclose as I know of and the ip’s were just way too many to list and thought I only had to disclose accounts. II’ll still try in 6 months. It is with good intentions and if I am biased I want to be helped to see how I can be less biased in the future hopefully if the community can unban me. I greatly appreciate you guys respond to me instead of me wondering if some people actually wanted me editing. I’ll stay away. Kansascitt1225 (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The point of the standard offer is for editors to demonstrate their self-restraint. Following the standard offer shows that someone is not fixated on a particular topic to the extent that they cannot leave it alone. Your current comments indicate the opposite. Johnuniq (talk) 07:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for letting me know Johnuniq. I appreciate you commenting here and your respect. I was just trying to help people understand where I was coming from as my case looks severely bad and I vandalized a lot in the beginning and made non constructive edits mostly in this topic. I’ll stop here and ping you in 6 months if that’s ok. Kansascitt1225 (talk) 10:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]