User talk:Libanguled

Welcome![edit]

Hi, Libanguled. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. GAB^gab 01:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Libanguled, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Libanguled! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Libanguled (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock-puppet. I use a public IP. I have never participated any socket-puppet activity. Please unblock my account.

Decline reason:

The behavioural evidence on top of the technical evidence is far too strong for me to believe that explanation. Huon (talk) 01:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have another account only called guled2016 and I do not use it for any sock-puppet activities. Why am I being blocked? Is having two accounts against Wikipedia rules? Libanguled (talk) 01:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Libanguled (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why I am being blocked. I have another account only called guled2016. Is having two accounts against wikipedia rules? I did not use my accounts in any bad faith activities. Please explain to me why I was blocked. Libanguled (talk) 01:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're editing logged out as 71.35.131.7 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 174.31.190.82 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). PhilKnight (talk) 01:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See WP:SOCK. Using an undisclosed second account to edit the same topic area is considered an attempt to evade scrutiny. Huon (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know that because I am new to Wikipedia. I will not use the second account again. Libanguled (talk) 11:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you denied your sockpuppetry in your original unblock request, only to subsequently admit that you... well, were not honest... once that was declined? --Yamla (talk) 20:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the term sock puppet meant helping blocked users by restoring their edits and I was denying making edits for blocked users when I said I am not a sock puppet. I thought I was accused of helping a blocked user called Blabmone by restoring his edits. "This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sock puppet of Blabmone (talk · contribs · logs),"[1] I did not know the meaning of sock puppet but I read this quote and thought sock puppet meant being a puppet for blocked users. I never used my other account guled2016 for bad faith activities. Libanguled (talk) 00:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about Guledd369? Are you related to that user? Vanjagenije (talk) 12:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not related to the user Guledd369. I am not related to any user except guled2016 which is my only other username. Please forgive my mistake of having two usernames. I did not know having two usernames was against Wikipedia rules because I am a new user. Libanguled (talk) 15:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Came here from the SPI investigation. Honestly, I think this user deserves another chance, as this is only their first violation. Many new users don't know about the alternate accounts policy, in my opinion the block should be reduced. But if they are caught socking again they should be blocked indefinitely. Sro23 (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I take it back. It looks like they are currently evading their block at 71.35.131.7 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 174.31.190.82 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Sro23 (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Libanguled/sandbox/libanguled[edit]

Hello, Libanguled. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/libanguled".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 14:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]