User talk:Moviefreek
Welcome!
Hello, Moviefreek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
The Unsung Heroes[edit]
Hi! I just took some time to clean up The Unsung Heroes (film). It looks like you previously added several wikilinks that were inappropriate per WP:OVERLINKING. We do not need to link common words, this is not helpful to the reader. Also, it appears that some of the citations included are not reliable, I have not been able to find that the film has actually shown at the festivals that the articles claim it has won awards at. I have been bold and removed those citations. Please make sure that when you make additions, you are sure that the content is verifiable. Please let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 11:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Sure.....thanks a lot for pitching in.....I will get right sources and will resubmit for review..... kindly help me publish too Moviefreek (talk) 04:44, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- I'm really concerned about this edit you made to the article. Many of the sources you added are duplicates - they contain the same information - where we only need one source to indicate the info. Furthermore, you continue to remove the notability tag without addressing the concern. All of the citations that have been provided are promotional, there is nothing that is looking at the topic critically (professional reviews, independent coverage of production). Please find new sources before readding them. The edexlive citation also is dubious as it contains unverifiable information (showing at particular sources). Please do not readd this source without discussing it further. Finally, you continue to add accolades that are not notable. Per MOS:FILM we should limit listed awards to those that are notable, meaning those that have their own article. Finally, please do not add multiple links to the same article per WP:DUPLINK. BOVINEBOY2008 17:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Muscroft the Saviours[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Muscroft the Saviours. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Unsung Heroes (film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Unsung Heroes (film). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:34C9:921C:530D:78BC (talk) 08:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Dear team....I am an independent editor who wants to contribute to Wikipedia as moviefreek have a very good knowledge in films and associated area that is were I started contributing by creating films page which has good coverages and not exist in Wikipedia but as a beginner I have lot of issues initially because the policy and the steps it take to publish in Wikipedia created lot of issues.
To confirm I have done research on subject , article, photos and even took approvals from production house before using their photos, posters & other materials to conplie with Wikipedia policy. But unfortunately that is something went wrong and miss interpret and it went to adding (conflict of interest) on me.
And also I can confirm that I have only one official account that's Moviefreek and not responsible for any other account which is also editing the pages I have created.
The pages I have created have genuine Article/news/tv reports and the movie's are released in platforms such and Amazon prime,Filmera, Hotstar etc..
It would be great if someone can help me remove the block/restrictions made on me including COI and guide me how can I contribute Wikipedia without issues.
Thanks a lot for the support Moviefreek
Moviefreek (talk) 07:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Improving Muscroft the Saviours[edit]
Dear team, i would like improve this article. could you please tell me what are the details you are looking for to compile with Wikipedia guideline. followed by my research i could see that lot of independant medias/news papers articles and channels has covered. this movie and is available in Amazon Prime , Filmera, Collective Frames Youtube channel etc...some of them are below. and the movie name (Muscroft The Saviours has mentioned in other articles too)
Exclusive Articles About Muscroft The Saviours and its Crew.
1, The New Indian Express : - https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/2018/dec/18/saviours-of-the-strays-1912872.html
2, Technopark Today :- http://www.technoparktoday.com/baburaj-asariya-turns-camera-towards-british-couple-who-saves-the-stray-dogs-in-kerala/
3, Plumeria movie :- https://www.plumeriamovies.com/baburaj-asariyas-muscroft-the-saviours-is-a-tale-that-will-rush-blissful-emotions-into-you/
4, https://www.newsdogapp.com/en/article/5c11de9612313a00b8507283/?d=false
5, https://www.nyoooz.com/news/kochi/1420144/baburaj-asariya-filmmaker-with-a-cause/
6, Manorama Online :- https://www.manoramaonline.com/environment/wild-life/2020/01/09/muscroft-the-saviours-non-featured-film.html
7, Mathrubhumi Online News :- https://www.manoramaonline.com/environment/wild-life/2020/01/09/muscroft-the-saviours-non-featured-film.html
Article that are mentioning about Muscrot The Saviours
1, Login Kerala :- https://loginkerala.com/baburaj-asariyas-new-webseries/
2, Metro Vartha :- http://www.metrovaartha.com/news/75876/mr-and-mrs-web-series-released
3, Trivandrum Life : - https://trivandrumlife.com/baburaj-asariyas-mr-and-mrs-is-getting-viral/
4, The New Indian Express :- https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/2019/nov/27/baburaj-asariya-filmmaker-with-a-cause-2067517.html
5, The New Indian Express EDEXO Live : -https://www.edexlive.com/people/2019/jun/19/this-award-winning-film-maker-from-kerala-raises-awareness-about-the-importance-of-ambulance-drivers-6688.html
6, Technopark Today :- https://www.technoparktoday.com/techie-film-maker-baburaj-asariyas-mr-and-mrs-is-getting-viral/
7, The New Indian Express :- https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/thiruvananthapuram/2019/feb/14/a-poetic--drama-of--the-time-1938914.html
8, Technopark Today :- http://www.technoparktoday.com/haram-techies-short-movie-with-a-cause/
9, Manoram News :- https://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/short-films/2019/11/27/haram-short-film.html
10, Manorama News :- https://www.manoramaonline.com/movies/short-films/2021/08/23/Baburaj-Asariya-web-series.amp.html
11, Mathrubhumi News :- https://www.mathrubhumi.com/movies-music/ott/mr-mrs-comedy-web-series-onam-special-video-baburaj-asariya-visakh-karunakaran-1.5921613
12, Mathrubhumi News : - https://www.mathrubhumi.com/movies-music/short-films/haram-malayalam-shortfilm-1.4309272 etc..
Amazon Prime UK :- https://www.amazon.co.uk/Muscroft-Saviours-Mary/dp/B081PLL9VP Amazon Prime : US https://www.amazon.com/Muscroft-Saviours-Mary/dp/B081PQVXCK
1, Having featured in multiple news papper/Channels/Big Platforms, why the movie is not meeting the wikipedia notability guidelines?
2, Articles that are relevant to this page is getting removed, could somebody check and link the same.
3, Could somebody guide me how this can be updated properly so that the article compile with Wiki guidelines.
Managing a conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, Moviefreek. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page The Unsung Heroes (film), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. From your contributions here, it is evident that you have a conflict of interest and should avoiding editing this and other related articles. BOVINEBOY2008 12:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Dear team....I am an independent editor who wants to contribute to Wikipedia as moviefreek have a very good knowledge in films and associated area that is were I started contributing by creating films page which has good coverages and not exist in Wikipedia but as a beginner I have lot of issues initially because the policy and the steps it take to publish in Wikipedia created lot of issues.
To confirm I have done research on subject , article, photos and even took approvals from production house before using their photos, posters & other materials to conplie with Wikipedia policy. But unfortunately that is something went wrong and miss interpret and it went to adding (conflict of interest) on me.
And also I can confirm that I have only one official account that's Moviefreek and not responsible for any other account which is also editing the pages I have created.
The pages I have created have genuine Article/news/tv reports and the movie's are released in platforms such and Amazon prime,Filmera, Hotstar etc..
It would be great if someone can help me remove the block/restrictions made on me including COI and guide me how can I contribute Wikipedia without issues.
Thanks a lot for the support Moviefreek
Moviefreek (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Haram (short film) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haram (short film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
BOVINEBOY2008 22:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi team.....I will help this page improving by adding citations & articles... kindly guide and support Moviefreek (talk) 07:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Voice of the Voiceless (film) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice of the Voiceless (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
BOVINEBOY2008 00:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Bovineboy 2008, I can actually provide citations/article/related information....as this has good coverages. Could you please help me or guide me how can i contribute to improve this page Moviefreek (talk) 06:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moviefreek, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
BOVINEBOY2008 17:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Dear team....I am an independent editor who wants to contribute to Wikipedia as moviefreek have a very good knowledge in films and associated area that is were I started contributing by creating films page which has good coverages and not exist in Wikipedia but as a beginner I have lot of issues initially because the policy and the steps it take to publish in Wikipedia created lot of issues.
To confirm I have done research on subject , article, photos and even took approvals from production house before using their photos, posters & other materials to conplie with Wikipedia policy. But unfortunately that is something went wrong and miss interpret and it went to adding (conflict of interest) on me.
And also I can confirm that I have only one official account that's Moviefreek and not responsible for any other account which is also editing the pages I have created.
The pages I have created have genuine Article/news/tv reports and the movie's are released in platforms such and Amazon prime,Filmera, Hotstar etc..
It would be great if someone can help me remove the block/restrictions made on me including COI and guide me how can I contribute Wikipedia without issues.
Thanks a lot for the support Moviefreek
Moviefreek (talk) 07:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021[edit]
Please refrain from adding commentary to articles, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to discuss the article, please use [[Talk:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance]]. Eric talk 11:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
My apologies, will avoid in future and ensure this wouldn't repeat....thanks for pointing this out Moviefreek (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 19:54, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Moviefreek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am relatively new editor in wiki and due to lack of awareness on the policy has made this problem. and i believe that i have a good knowledge in film and would like to contribute to wiki by creating acclaimed works which are not in Wikipedia yet. that is how i started creating pages but unfortunately due to some issues which led to block my account. my edit may have issues because of lack of policy awareness but what i have created has the credibility and enough information/news and tv news has been available in internet itself. I apologies for any inconvenience that has created issues in this space. i will ensure this wouldn't happen again. kindly unblock and guide me how can i contribute to wiki following its rules. I am happy that an experienced editor can help me verify or guide me to improve my future edits
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
User:Moviefreek I can confirm that i have only one account, that is moviefreek. i can't be responsible for any other id created. how should i responsible for other accounts ? which is absolutely not in my control. could someone help me to unblock my account and if there is a duplicate account existing you may please go ahead and block that one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moviefreek (talk • contribs) 07:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moviefreek, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
BOVINEBOY2008 23:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Moviefreek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't have multiple account in Wikipedia, I am active only in moviefreek. if without my consent if any other account has been active in wiki then kindly block that account. if at all any of my edit or behaviors is against the Wikipedia norms, i would apologies and will ensure that this won't happen again. kindly accept my request and unblock moviefreek. (talk)
Decline reason:
Confirmed logged-out editing, no comment on the particular IP addresses involved here. Yamla (talk) 10:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Moviefreek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thanks Yamla, I have given detailed explanation on what went wrong from my side and apologized for the same. whatever happened is because of my lack of awareness on the wiki policy & method of editing that the way an experienced editor do. Please guide me what i should do to get this issue sorted and unblock my account. i sincerely want to contribute to wiki and will ensure any of the issue point out wouldn't repeat in future
Decline reason:
Again, not really addressing the issue, and honestly looking over all your requests I would ask you to ask yourself if your English is really good enough to be editing here rather than your native language Wikipedia. That may be part of your problem. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Moviefreek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Someone please tell me what should i do to unblock my account.
I believe, i have addressed all the issues pointed out by wiki editors and apologized for the same. to reiterate
1, I don't have multiple account in Wikipedia, I am active only in moviefreek. if without my consent if any other account has been active in wiki then kindly block that account. if at all, any of my edit or behaviours is against the Wikipedia norms, my apologies and will ensure that this won't happen again. kindly accept my request and unblock moviefreek.
2, I don't intentionally do log out editing and as you may be aware my account is currently blocked.
3, English is just a language to communicate ideas and hope my idea is getting communicated here.
Decline reason:
This doesn't add anything material to the previous appeals. I have withdrawn your ability to edit this page. MER-C 17:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Baburaj Asariya moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Baburaj Asariya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Collective Frames for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collective Frames until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
BOVINEBOY2008 18:17, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
The article Muscroft the Saviours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
The article The Unsung Heroes (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Baburaj Asariya[edit]
Hello, Moviefreek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Baburaj Asariya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Baburaj Asariya[edit]
Hello, Moviefreek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Baburaj Asariya".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)