User talk:Nate Speed

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can I edit again please? Nate Speed (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no indication that you have any idea why you were blocked, and I do not see any indication of how you will correct those problems. Kuru (talk) 18:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because this account was seen as a "sockpuppeteer" of other accounts I use, and also because I was edit warring with Spshu. Nate Speed (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's why you were blocked, yes. Now, why should we unblock you? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just learned a lesson. I'm sorry for sockpuppetry. Also, I won't edit war with other users again. I've waited seven months. Nate Speed (talk) 17:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Apparently you aren't sorry enough for your sockpuppetry to stop using multiple accounts. Copy-pasting the same unblock request to several accounts shows you don't understand the issue. Huon (talk) 18:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to say this: I'm really sorry for sockpuppetry, and I admit, I won't use multiple accounts again. As I said before, I've waited seven months. Nate Speed (talk) 00:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You used multiple accounts in the last 24 hours. PhilKnight (talk) 01:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, now I had to wait 24 hours not to use multiple accounts. I won't use them again, and as I said before, I'm sorry for the sockpuppetry. Now can you please unlock my accounts? Nate Speed (talk) 04:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are kidding, right? You lied and said you waited seven months, only to have it pointed out that you were violating your block within the past 24 hours. No. Refrain from editing Wikipedia for six months and then try convincing us you are serious. It's clear you aren't at the moment. Yamla (talk) 12:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't want to wait two years to edit again. This isn't my main account anymore because I stopped using it nine years ago, and I've added more sources on the Family Home Entertainment page when I reverted it because the company is notable with VHS buffs. Nate Speed (talk) 04:45, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 05:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seriously, I stopped using this account as my main one eight years ago, and the reason it was permanently blocked is that I only revisited it two years ago because my OTHER accounts where blocked for edit warring. You have to unblock. Nate Speed (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You aren't eligible for unblock consideration unless you have performed ZERO EDITS (with ANY account or IP address) for at least the past six months. As this is not currently true, I've revoked your talk page access to stop you wasting our time any further. Once you've waited at least six months, you are free to use WP:UTRS. Until then, we won't consider unblocking you. Yamla (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16445 was submitted on Aug 31, 2016 11:35:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16448 was submitted on Sep 01, 2016 01:01:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nate Speed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16452 was submitted on Sep 01, 2016 23:47:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Nate Speed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nate Speed, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Largoplazo (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]