User talk:Pichemist/Archive 26
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | → | Archive 30 |
Request for more specific feedback
Dear Pichemist,
Thank you for taking the time to review my submitted bio article on Lee Jae-yoon (singer). I have worked hard to model this page on existing approved Wikipedia pages for similar artists, and also to address prior reviewer comments on order to ensure a neutral tone based on a wide variety of independent sources. Would it be possible for you to provide more specific feedback on issues that you found with my draft article? There are many examples of approved pages with similar content, so I'm trying to get a better understanding of what's expected here.
Thank you in advance for considering my request. I highly value your input, expertise, and time.
Sincerely, whatsauthentic 65.92.70.208 (talk) 23:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- I do not think I can find the article? Can you link it? Thank you. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 09:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, my apologies! Here's the link. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lee_Jae-yoon_(singer)
- Thank you. Whatsauthentic (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- As stated in a comment beforehand, the article is very clearly not written in a neutral tone. The phrases: "known for his attractive visuals" "smooth honey voice" "strong performances" have been removed, the underlying message of what reads like a fan fiction prevails. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 07:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Pichemist,
- I respectfully disagree. I'm a university professor. I know how to cite facts and include appropriate sources. I do not believe you are providing a fair review. There is nothing included in the article that has not been cited by a third party media / industry source. Please provide more specific feedback. The article is not fictional, nor opinion-based. I have included only facts from external, reputable industry Korean-pop culture sources.
- Sincerely, Whatsauthentic (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- I see. I understand my review might not be fair and I'm willing to review it again in a bit of time. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 21:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Pichemist, Thank you for reconsidering. In the meantime, I will review it again, trying to take your perspective. I will see if I can clean it up further. I do appreciate your valuable time and willingness to reconsider. Sincerely, Whatsauthentic (talk) 03:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- I see. I understand my review might not be fair and I'm willing to review it again in a bit of time. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 21:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- As stated in a comment beforehand, the article is very clearly not written in a neutral tone. The phrases: "known for his attractive visuals" "smooth honey voice" "strong performances" have been removed, the underlying message of what reads like a fan fiction prevails. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 07:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)