User talk:Pichemist/Archive 28
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | → | Archive 35 |
Request on 14:29:58, 3 January 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by TallMick81
- TallMick81 (talk · contribs)
Hi. Thanks for your review of the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hugh_Goldsmith. I was just wondering whether it would be possible to get some more detailed feedback. I can definitely add more inline citations, though most of the times Hugh Goldsmith is mentioned in articles it is very positive and I was worried about the article sounding too promotional in tone. Do you have any suggestions for reducing the promotional tone it has at the moment. Thanks so much for your help.
TallMick81 (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- In order to improve your chances of your draft getting accepted, I've added a [citation needed] template wherever an inline citation would do good. This is a WP:BLP and thus requires that all claims be referenced and verifiable. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 14:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Thanks so much for your help. The requested citations have been added to the draft of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hugh_Goldsmith. Do I resubmit the draft to the queue for checking or will you reexamine it to see whether it meets Wikipedia's standards? Thanks again.
- TallMick81 (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Articles for Creation Barnstar | |
| Thank you for participating in Articles for Creation's January 2023 Backlog Drive! You reviewed 199 drafts, for a total of 290 points. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) |
Request on 14:11:52, 23 January 2023 for assistance on Draft:Universidad Modelo submission by TheXaton
Hello, I'd first like to thank you for revieweing my article. I've been meaning to ask what claims were unreferenced in the draft I submitted. I've been trying to gather as much references as possible, using news articles from my region, and trying to avoid publications from the institution itself.
I don't mean to be rude at all. Although, I'll confess it is sad to see so many universities from my country added to Wikipedia with not a single reference. Seeing mine rejected for missing some, while others have zero, is starting to get exhausting.
Would you mind telling me which other claims should be referenced for my University to be considered? Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated.