User talk:TheCatalyst31/Archive 15
Nomination of Trotters, North Dakota for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trotters, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 03:27, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users[edit]
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Ladoga, North Dakota for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladoga, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 01:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Skaar, North Dakota for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skaar, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 02:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Harmon, North Dakota for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harmon, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harmon, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Grass Creek, Wyoming for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grass Creek, Wyoming until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–dlthewave ☎ 22:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Pitcairn, North Dakota for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pitcairn, North Dakota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pitcairn, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Meadow Oaks, Florida for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadow Oaks, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
BilledMammal (talk) 02:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Pierce, Slope County, North Dakota for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierce, Slope County, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 04:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Greenfield, North Dakota for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenfield, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 05:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Leck Kill, Pennsylvania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND; no indication of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilledMammal (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Stonecoal Junction, West Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad junction, not a community. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Not to be confused with Stonecoal, West Virginia or Stonecoal Creek, both of which are more notable than this entity.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 05:10, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Shady Grove, Montgomery County, Tennessee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Google Maps shows a Shady Grove Road, but I don't see any newspaper.com sources that makes this a notable community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 00:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Reliance, Claiborne County, Tennessee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I see no community here, and Topo shows a site on the railroad and a mine nearby but still no community. Newspapers has a hit for a Reliance Coal and Coke Co. but this appears to be another GNIS and mass-production failure.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 00:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement[edit]
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect Name for Unincorporated Community in Clinton County, Illinois[edit]
I just wanted to point out that maps (Even the Coordinates Map listed under the map of Illinois on this page) has this unincorporated community as Stolletown. Is it Stottletown or Stolletown? I can not find a Stottletown any where in Clinton County on any map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:7780:6E20:30B6:BB60:E25F:E69F (talk) 05:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Burnett, Illinois has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
GNIS-only article without even demographics
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dege31 (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Churchill, Illinois for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Dege31 (talk) 18:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Hegeler, Bureau County, Illinois for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hegeler, Bureau County, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 05:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Hicks Corners, Illinois has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Love, Illinois for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Limerick, Illinois for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limerick, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 16:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Langley, Illinois for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Langley, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Mangoe (talk) 02:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Hiroshima station references[edit]
I cannot begin to tell you how much I appreciate your referencing all those station. I've been struggling through the January 2007 unreferenced articles for what feels like 40 years in the desert and you cleared SO much of it. Thanks a million - Kazamzam (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- No worries. I'm not sure if you're aware of this discussion, but it alerted me (and a few other editors by the looks of it) to the problem. While I don't support the proposal, I'm hoping the discussion inspires more people to help out with our massive backlog of unreferenced articles. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 18:10, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- I heard! I really don't think it would be a good idea, we would lose thousands of perfectly decent articles even if there are a few (relatively) duds in the mix. The Jalan bunch is really frustrating but I'm just chipping away at everything else. I've been using this template (Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles; you can help!) to describe the changes so that more people will at least see the Unreferenced Articles project if you want to tack that on as a quick and easy edit summary.
- That's not a bad idea. Maybe I should look into joining the project, too. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 18:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- I heard! I really don't think it would be a good idea, we would lose thousands of perfectly decent articles even if there are a few (relatively) duds in the mix. The Jalan bunch is really frustrating but I'm just chipping away at everything else. I've been using this template (Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles; you can help!) to describe the changes so that more people will at least see the Unreferenced Articles project if you want to tack that on as a quick and easy edit summary.
Nomination of Aiken, Illinois for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aiken, Illinois, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aiken, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
CSD for Napoleonic (EP) and The Four Hundred (band)?[edit]
I agree with the proposal for deletion but I think, at least for the EP, a CSD is an easy call. An independent EP put out by a band that likely does not meet significance criteria itself does not an article make. My larger motive is to clear out January 2007 but I think this is a valid concern and will pop up more often as the unreferenced backlog is grindingly worked through. Kazamzam (talk) 18:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- The article doesn't qualify for speedy deletion; CSD A9, which would be the relevant criterion, explicitly excludes recordings by artists that have a Wikipedia article, and the article on the artist at least makes a claim of significance. Even if it did technically meet the criteria for speedy deletion, I don't generally like to speedy delete older articles, especially ones that have been around more than a decade (unless it's an urgent concern like copyright or a blatant hoax); if nobody has noticed a non-notable article for that long, it's not going to hurt anything to keep it around for another week and go through PROD/AFD. I'd love to see the January 2007 category cleared out too, but I don't think we should bend process to do it; there's nothing wrong with waiting an extra week, especially for a category that old. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 00:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Switzer Crossroads, Indiana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No significant coverage of any form; is apparently a named road junction. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 05:34, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Hamdy El-Said for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamdy El-Said until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 13:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Clear Lake, Cass County, Illinois for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear Lake, Cass County, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
–dlthewave ☎ 05:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Cairo Junction, Illinois for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cairo Junction, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
–dlthewave ☎ 06:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Mohamed Daud Mohamed for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Daud Mohamed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
The article Eszter Hortobagyi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
wp:BEFORE search, haven't found notable sources other than databases. Appears to fail wp:NOLYMPICS and wp:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NytharT.C 09:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of West Virginia Central Junction, West Virginia for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Virginia Central Junction, West Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:52, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Sloan Station, Illinois for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sloan Station, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
–dlthewave ☎ 21:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of María Montenegro for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Montenegro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 11:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Calhoun Junction, Arkansas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of a community, no significant coverage to meet GNG for this junction.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 17:17, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
The article Ashdale Junction, Illinois has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of a community at this location, and insufficient significant coverage to meet GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 02:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
The article Agnew, Illinois has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable railroad junction mislabeled as a community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Eads Mill, West Virginia for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eads Mill, West Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
–dlthewave ☎ 15:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Childs, Arizona for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Childs, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
–dlthewave ☎ 16:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Bahia, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is nothing to be found on any detail of this place even existing as a census-designated place. Government websites don't pull up any info on it either, and the area is unpopulated in the Baylands. Does not seem possible to expand this article beyond the single source reference, lacks WP:Notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Walapai, Arizona for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walapai, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe (talk) 02:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Gray Mountain, Arizona for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gray Mountain, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mangoe (talk) 02:43, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in December 2022[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Transfer, PA[edit]
I’ve done more research and found more people for the “Famous people” paragraph. I can insure you that everyone on their is deserving. Trenton.wish (talk) 23:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023[edit]
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging