User talk:Trenton 1214

Trenton 1214, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Trenton 1214! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm FormalDude. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mike Lindell seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 03:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't see it as inaccurate since I got that info from the Washington post Trenton 1214 (talk) 22:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Mike Lindell for one week, because you used a false edit summary "fixed spacing" and you are removing well referenced content without explanation. Make your case at Talk: Mike Lindell and do not return to disruptive editing when this block ends. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2000 United States presidential election in Florida. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Donald Albury 22:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Donald Albury 22:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Donald Albury 22:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trenton 1214 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, I am requesting an unblock. I understand if it is not allowed, though. I'll start from the very beginning. When I was younger, I made this account Trenton 1214. I was immature, and I vandalized a few pages. I made another account for basically the same thing, but luckily, they were blocked. Then, about a year later, I decided to take Wikipedia seriously. I tried my hardest to contribute to Wikipedia and improve articles. Mainly with WikiFazBear. It got blocked because of sock puppeting even though I didn't vandalize. I then made a few other accounts so I could continue contributing to wikipedia. If you look at their editing history, there is nothing bad that I did to destroy a page. I just want to contribute to Wikipedia. My vandalism days are far over. With my other accounts, I have edited and contributed a lot. If you guys think I have vandalized on the other accounts, it was probably a misunderstanding, and I could explain the reason. I totally understand if you don't trust me. But I just really like editing Wikipedia, and now I'm doing it for good. I'm sorry for my old vandalism. It has been almost 3 years since I vandalized a page on purpose. I am very sad that my edits were all reverted. I can answer any questions if you need answers. I got unbanned after a year, so I thought I can make a new account since I got unbanned. But I guess I can't, and my pass will always haunt me. I am sorry for everything. Trenton 1214 (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not yet waited six months with zero edits, as suggested over at User talk:WikiFazBear1984 (WP:SO). Given your violation of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK just yesterday, I don't see any other path forward for you at this time. Yamla (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla so if I wait 6 months, can I request again?

Yes. It's not a guarantee at that point; WP:SO goes into more details. --Yamla (talk) 14:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla okay thanks a lot! I should have red the sock puppeting rules before I made a other accounts after I got unbanned, I'm so dumb. Thank and sorry for everything I won't be making new accounts in the future.

Girth Summit sorry too, I didn't read the rules. I thought I got unbanned so it was cool to make an account again. The Spy crab account kept glitching so I just didn't use the account anymore. Sorry again I am very dumb