User talk:Ulster1912

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Apollo The Logician (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:45, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ulster1912 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for apparently being a sockpuppetry of User:Apollo The Logician. I am not that user, I have seen no evidence I am that user. The reason given for my ban is "suspected sockpuppet", how can you ban someone due to suspicion? God and Ulster (talk) 08:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Very, very obviously not a new editor. And all the evidence points to you indeed being a sock of Apollo the Logician. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If it's not obvious enough, see the the editor interaction analyser, especially [1] and [2]; [3] and [4]; [5] and [6]. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We both edit similar (Religion and Ireland) articles which is far from conclusive proof.God and Ulster (talk) 09:04, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quite obvious, and quite an ironic choice of user name. Mabuska ^(talk) 13:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a duck to me. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you say that User:Mabuska and User:Guy Macon God and Ulster (talk) 21:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly expected something better than "it is obvious". How is it obvious User:Yamla?God and Ulster (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser Confirmed. Sock tag updated and talk page access revoked.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]