User talk:Vegawolfdog
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
January 2021[edit]
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Secret of NIMH, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You should also provide some context as to how it's anything other than a point of WP:TRIVIA that these were their last roles. DonIago (talk) 04:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
September 2021[edit]
Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dancing with the Stars (American season 30), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. From the looks of it, the only sites currently reporting this competitor are fan-run sites, which are WP:NOTRS. Please provide a reliable source for your contributions. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 21:12, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Strictly Come Dancing series 19[edit]
What about AJ's scores from the judges? Scores for Rose & Sara please? Add the scores as we go along please? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 19:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Strictly Come Dancing series 19[edit]
Add this week scores please? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 18:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Strictly Come Dancing series 19[edit]
More scores to add as we go along please? Don't forget to add John, Rose & Rhys' scores please? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 19:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Strictly Come Dancing series 19[edit]
Halloween Week scores please? Don't forget Judi & Tom's scores, now add to the Halloween week table. --Annamargarita0 (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Strictly Come Dancing series 19 week 7[edit]
You know the drill. Rest of the table scores please? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 19:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Strictly Come Dancing series 19 Musicals week[edit]
You know the drill, more scores please? Dan's score please Vegawolfdog? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 19:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Strictly Come Dancing series 19[edit]
More scores for the semi-final please? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 19:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Pacific Division standings[edit]
Standings are updated at conclusion of the night's games, otherwise confusion ensues. Please stop updating VGK's record immediately after the game.The Kip (talk) 05:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Pacific Division standings - II[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Template:2021-22 NHL Pacific Division standings, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Seriously, you've been warned twice already to not edit until the end of the night's games. Quit it.
October 2022[edit]
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! Raydann (talk) 18:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
August 2023[edit]
Hello, I'm Bgsu98. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Bgsu98 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dancing with the Stars. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello I'm not in a content dispute with anyone,but your edits are disruptive, I just feel removing the colors for highest and lowest scores is unnecessary and my edits are constructive, I've been editing for years and I don't want to cause trouble, the articles were fine the way they were before you changed them. So please leave the dancing with the stars pages alone thank you Vegawolfdog (talk) 05:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- No, they constitute Wikipedia:OR or WP:SYNTHESIS and are inappropriate. Just because something has “always been that way” does not excuse nonsense that is contrary to the MOS. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- you're wrong Vegawolfdog (talk) 05:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Additionally, the score chart toward the top of each article already identifies the highest and lowest scores each week, so it is also redundant. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- the dance charts still show who got the highest and lowest scores it didn't matter Vegawolfdog (talk) 05:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t even know what that means. This is an encyclopedia, not a Dancing With the Stars fansite. Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Of course it's not I'll prove you wrong but right now I'm going to bed Vegawolfdog (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t even know what that means. This is an encyclopedia, not a Dancing With the Stars fansite. Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- the dance charts still show who got the highest and lowest scores it didn't matter Vegawolfdog (talk) 05:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- No, they constitute Wikipedia:OR or WP:SYNTHESIS and are inappropriate. Just because something has “always been that way” does not excuse nonsense that is contrary to the MOS. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Dancing with the Stars (American season 1) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Do not revert this article again. Take it to the Talk Page if you have a dispute. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Dancing with the stars[edit]
hello, as a fan of Dancing with the stars and a fellow editor for this site, I just want to say I'm not causing any Wikipedia:Fancruft I just preferred the old version of it and without it wouldn't make sense, you don't own any article on Wikipedia, it's for everyone
September 2023[edit]
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Dancing with the Stars (American TV series), you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please stop adding indiscriminate information that is not noteworthy to the individual seasons. This is not a fan website. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- I know it's not a fan site, I just say you don't the site, nobody owns it. I do respect other editors, but I just don't like changes ok Vegawolfdog (talk) 00:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- You clearly don’t realize this isn’t a fan website since you continually try to add a bunch of fan-driven nonsense to the articles. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- it wasn't fan driven nonsense when I started editing 5 years ago Vegawolfdog (talk) 00:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- You clearly don’t realize this isn’t a fan website since you continually try to add a bunch of fan-driven nonsense to the articles. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:34, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Unblock Kiwi Jaden[edit]
I feel like it's unfair for a long time editor like kiwi Jaden to be block he or she may have did something but i believe in second chances Vegawolfdog (talk) 16:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
September 2023[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 16:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)- Be warned that if you continue to edit-war on other Dancing with the Stars articles, this will be upgraded to a longer-term site-wide block. Further, do not make false accusations of vandalism, as you did here: [1]. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 17:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Is this you? Are you Lakervega ? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'll take that as a "yes". -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Is closed.
September 2023[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Vegawolfdog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't abuse this
Decline reason:
My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 05:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
didn't abuse this, It's all a misunderstanding, if you can give a another chance I won't do anymore problems I swear Vegawolfdog (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Vegawolfdog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- Hello barkeep49, if you are getting this message, i just want to say I'm sorry. I didn't know if i was abusing this website, but i found out and it was wrong and i didn't mean for it to happen. I know i deserves this punishment, and i know i was originally blocked because of an edit war between me and Bgsu98, but the problem was i didn't start it. I know i shouldn't have done that, i wanted to stop cause i know it would get me blocked but Bgsu98 kept it going. I know im not supposed to make false accusations but it's true. I know i can't have inappropriate behavior and i regret it. I've been an editor for this website for years and i know when to respect others when they edit the pages. For most of them i let them do those pages while i help the others. Even though I made a mistake on what i did and deserve to be punishment for it. But to be honest, i just want another chance at editing. Even if you don't want me to and still have me blocked, and not unblock me anytime soon, i wouldn't care. So yeah, I'm sorry for the editing war and im sorry about the abuse and i won't do it again, i want to be unblocked by the time the new seasons of Dancing with the stars Americans series and the British version of the show,Strictly Come Dancing startVegawolfdog (talk) 14:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What did I do to abuse the multiple accounts, cause I don't know — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegawolfdog (talk • contribs)
- See WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note that unblock requests belong at the bottom of the page, not bizarrely in the middle, as you keep on placing them. --Yamla (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Vegawolfdog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
what did I do that was abusive to the multiple accounts, because I don't knowVegawolfdog (talk) 15:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Having multiple accounts editing the same topic is considered abuse. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to, and I'm sorry Vegawolfdog (talk) 17:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Unblock[edit]
Vegawolfdog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I read the WP:SOCK and the other things about the abuse, I know what I did was wrong, and I'm sorry, I didn't mean to do it and i didn't know it was wrong i want another chance. I want to be unblocked by the time the new seasons of Dancing with the Stars American series and the British version of the show, Strictly Come Dancing Start. If you don't want to because you don't trust me that's fineVegawolfdog (talk) 16:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
One open unblock request at a time, please. Which one request do you want to be reviewed (by another admin)? --Yamla (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Vegawolfdog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm no longer using an account on this website and I want to edit again without IP address,I won't use an account this again,since it's stupid and it's not fair, when I started editing, I was doing so well and I didn't get in trouble, maybe I made a mistake of signing up on this corrupted website and if don't want to take me back so be it since this website sucksVegawolfdog (talk) Today, 9:04 pm (UTC+1)
Decline reason:
Talk page access revoked for repeated non-constructive unblock requests. (The above wasn't an unblock request.) SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Deleting my account[edit]
im deleting my account Vegawolfdog (talk) 18:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
{{db-u1}}
- This page is not eligible for deletion. However, you are free to simply stop using this account. Remember, blocks apply to the person, not just the account. While this account is blocked, you personally are blocked. You personally are not allowed to edit Wikipedia. Note that you are free to remove all content from this page, including this message, with the exception of your declined unblock requests. You must leave those in place, unedited. --Yamla (talk) 18:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- (You have to leave them in place while the block is in place.) Barkeep49 (talk) 19:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
September 2023[edit]
