User talk:Yashthakurkamail

Welcome!

Hello, Yashthakurkamail.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do cite reliable sources

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't add original research

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 08:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Mahabharat (1988 TV series), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 06:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bhanumati (wife of Duryodhana) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bhanumati (wife of Duryodhana) was changed by Yashthakurkamail (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948454 on 2021-08-20T15:52:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JPxG. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Versions of Ramayana—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. jp×g 04:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bhanumati (wife of Duryodhana), you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding factually incorrect info to Stri Parva and Bhanumati articles [1]. If you feel the same is correct info, please provide References to substantiate the same. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Different versions of Mahabharata and Ramayana[edit]

The article Different versions of Mahabharata and Ramayana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CFORK of Versions of Ramayana. The author's contributions to the page were reverted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:17, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mahabharata. Materialscientist (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 16:09, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. But you seem to have a hard time sourcing anything. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yashthakurkamail (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Yashthakurkamail (talk) 16:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, RegentsPark. I have learnt about editing and I will be adding a reliable source of information before publishing the changes. Please unblock my account. I want to contribute to the Wikipedia organisation.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yashthakurkamail (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learnt editing on Wikipedia. I will be adding a reliable source of information before publishing articles. Please unblock my IP address and my accounts.

Decline reason:

Your IP will be unblocked when your account is. Since you have this account, do not worry about your IP address. Please tell us which other accounts that you have. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Goldilocks66 and this one are my accounts. Please unblock it, I will make useful contributions to articles nowonwards. I will also provide reliable source of information.

You have apparently used at least one other one as well. Any unblock request you make is unlikely to succeed unless you make it from your first, original account and wait six months without using any account or IP address to edit, to demonstrate that you can abide by guidelines. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please unblock my this account. I have been abiding guidelines since many days. I have also learnt editing and will be making useful contributions to Wikipedia.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yashthakurkamail (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, please I have been blocked since 2 months unnecessarily. This is my original account, please unblock this one. Please unblock me, I will be making useful contributions.

Decline reason:

You just got caught engaging in block evasion. Request declined. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 14:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yashthakurkamail (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account. I have learnt the rules and won't disrupt Wikipedia again. I have been blocked since 6 months.

Decline reason:

No evidence that reason for blocking has been understood or why it is no longer nessecary. Amortias (T)(C) 14:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Godwatch49 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Godwatch49. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]