Category talk:Magical superheroes

"These are the WikiProjects which cover magic"
added a large number of wikiprojects that are unrelated to magical superheroes. I removed them, and Dimadick reverted me with the comment in this heading. The statement is untrue; none of these projects covers every article related to magic. They may cover some, but not "magical superheroes". The articles in the category are about comics and fictional characters, but not anthropology, neopaganism, parapsychology, history etc. The category is outside the scope of all these projects. Dimadick, we had a similar discussion some months ago, where you added a lot of wikiprojects to categories because you wanted the projects to have more entries. Is there anything similar going on this time as well? Ffranc (talk) 10:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * See Talk:Magic (supernatural). Dimadick (talk) 11:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Are you referring to the fact that the main article on supernatural magic has these wikiproject tags? That doesn't translate to every other article that has something to do with magic. The tags are there because there is something in that article about each of those subjects, in the form of subtopics that receive some coverage. That's not going to be the case in the articles here, which are about one particular, pretty narrow subtopic. I think you made a similar argument last time. I'll try to revert you again. If you still want to argue, please look up the last discussion and see if I already responded to what you're going to say, and continue the discussion from there so we don't have to repeat everything. The last discussion ended when you said you added the tags because you wanted the categories for the wikiprojects to have more entries. I'm asking again, is there anything like that going on now? If the reason you are adding the tags is unrelated to policy discussions, we can save time by going directly to the actual issue. Ffranc (talk) 11:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)